Corporate Power and Responsible Capitalism?

Corporate Power and Responsible Capitalism?

Towards Social Accountability

Bryn Jones

In this important book, Bryn Jones uses insights from political economy, historical analysis and sociological concepts of the corporation, as a socially disembedded but political actor, to address concerns over the over-reach of Anglo-Saxon corporations. These firms are compared with their continental European and East Asian counterparts, both in their social and economic functions and their institutional structures. Jones then draws on alternative models proposed by advocates of CSR, cooperative enterprise and corporate democratisation, to argue for key reforms for corporations’ greater social accountability.

Chapter 6: Contextualising the neo-liberal model: social embeddedness of economic relations

Bryn Jones

Subjects: business and management, corporate governance, corporate social responsibility, international business, organisation studies, economics and finance, corporate governance, social policy and sociology, sociology and sociological theory


As the above quote indicates, the ST/EM corporate form seemed destined to become common around the world. By the mid-1990s neo-liberalism had effectively vanquished Marxist and collectivist ideas in the political arenas. Nevertheless intellectual interest grew in apparently successful business systems which did not conform to the ST/EM type. Explicitly or implicitly, the common attraction of these alternatives was their contrast to that model’s dislocation from civil society. Based more on sociology and social anthropology than Marxism, these assessments variously celebrated the virtues of continental Europe’s ‘Rhenish’ model of ‘coordinated capitalism’ (from countries bordering the river Rhine), the politically and culturally integrated corporate organisations in Japan, as well as the industrial districts of small firms in Italy and elsewhere. More recently the near-collapse of the financial system, in which the corporate system is enmeshed, has even stimulated an interest in the hybrid state-market structures which have continued to power Chinese growth while the West’s economies contract (Arrighi 2007, 2009). Analyses of these various alternative systems are not all based on the concept of social embeddedness. But, as originated by social anthropologist and historian Karl Polanyi, it is a useful tool for comparing the candidate systems and for judging their potential for re-balancing the economy-society relationship. During and after the Second World War, Polanyi synthesised economic anthropology and history into a critique of ‘formalistic’, neo-classical economics. His ideas have lately enjoyed a substantial revival amongst opponents of neo-liberal economics.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information