Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship

Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship

The Birth, Growth and Demise of Entrepreneurial Firms

Frédéric Delmar and Karl Wennberg

How and why are firms created, expanded and terminated by entrepreneurs in the knowledge intensive economy? The authors show these entrepreneurship processes are firmly embedded in a given social and economic context, that shapes the process by which some individuals discover entrepreneurial opportunities, creating new firms that sometimes grow to remarkable size, but more often stay mundane or eventually exit.

Chapter 7: Concluding Remarks

Frédéric Delmar and Karl Wennberg

Subjects: business and management, entrepreneurship


It is time to conclude and sum up the work presented in this book. We will here address the implications of our framework and of our major results on theory and method development, including for management and policy making. THEORETICAL IMPLICATIONS A good theory needs to be simple, parsimonious, and realistic. A reason to prefer simpler, more parsimonious theories is that such theories are more constraining and thus more falsifiable. A model that is not over-fitted to the data increases its credibility (Popper, 1959; Pearl, 2000). Moreover, it is easier to understand and apply. A theory also needs to be realistic in order for us to apply it in practice. This becomes even more evident for theoretical models based on observational data, as is the case in this book as in the majority of entrepreneurship studies. Theory is important for the following three reasons. First, the formal establishment of causality is a property of a theoretical model, not merely of data or statistical analyses. Hence we cannot understand and explain our data and analyses without theory. Second, many different theoretical models can explain the same data. We therefore need to choose a clear perspective and follow it through so as to be able to exclude alternative explanations to the greatest extent possible. Third, assumptions must be made in any model of a causal-deductive type. Therefore a good theory should allow us to derive a model which represents a logically consistent system within which hypothetical “thoughts experiments can be conducted to...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information