The Concept of Equilibrium in Different Economic Traditions

The Concept of Equilibrium in Different Economic Traditions

An Historical Investigation

Bert Tieben

This book deals with one of the most puzzling concepts in economic science, that of economic equilibrium. In modern economics, equilibrium is considered a key assumption, but its role is contested by economists both from within the mainstream and from rival schools of thought.

Chapter 2: What is Equilibrium?

Bert Tieben

Subjects: economics and finance, austrian economics, history of economic thought, methodology of economics, post-keynesian economics


INTRODUCTION The first question to be addressed in this book is what equilibrium means. This is by no means an easy task, given that economic theory abounds in different conceptions of economic equilibrium. Fritz Machlup (1958) once tried organizing them, but ended up complaining about their many meanings. And this was fifty years ago, long before mathematical economists working in game theory started developing refinements of the Nash equilibrium, which resulted in many new equilibrium concepts. Is there no way to structure this complex heap of different definitions and develop a more workable perspective on equilibrium theory? I believe there is. 1 The purpose of this chapter is to introduce several distinctions concerning the definition of economic equilibrium that I shall use throughout this book and that allow me to present the history of equilibrium theory in economics in a structured manner. One of the key distinctions that plays a role in this history is that between equilibrium as an end-state and equilibrium as a process. I shall explain this distinction and its implications in the next subsection. Looking at equilibrium theory in this way suggests that the element of time plays a crucial role in our in perception of what equilibrium means. As Rizzo (1979, 2) says, economists do not really have a choice as to whether they will use equilibrium concepts. The notion of equilibrium is an indispensable tool of analysis, because there is no means of studying complex phenomena other than by first abstracting from change altogether....

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information