Table of Contents

Theory and Practice of Harmonisation

Theory and Practice of Harmonisation

Edited by Mads Andenas and Camilla Baasch Andersen

Harmonised and uniform international laws are now being spread across different jurisdictions and fields of law, bringing with them an increasing body of scholarship on practical problems and theoretical dimensions. This comprehensive and insightful book focuses on the contributions to the development and understanding of the critical theory of harmonisation.

Chapter 22: Comparative Law and European Harmonisation – a Match Made in Heaven or Uneasy Bedfellows?

Dagmar Schiek

Subjects: asian studies, asian law, law - academic, asian law, european law


Dagmar Schiek* Introduction The title of this chapter maintains a contradictory relationship between comparative law and European harmonisation theories. On the one hand, conventional approaches to comparative law are said to have been revived by common core studies, based on their tendency for universalism (Örücü 2007: 51). Traditional comparative law and European harmonisation thus seem a match made in heaven. On the other hand, approaches to comparative law which stress diversity of socio-legal and cultural contexts of legal institutions may well be sceptical of any mission to use comparative law for finding a best (and possibly uniform) European way to any issue (Nelken 2007:1, 31). Such critical branches of comparative law and European harmonisation may thus appear as uneasy bedfellows. The question behind this is what, if anything, critical comparative law may be able to contribute to a theory of European legal harmonisation. Working towards such a theory, it is worthwhile to consider theoretical approaches to law, among which critical comparative law may have a claim to belong. In relation to comparative law, this chapter does not make any suggestion that this approach to law is sufficient to form a theory of harmonisation. Under Articles 114−115 TFEU, harmonisation (referred to as ‘approximation of laws’) is pursued in order to achieve specific goals, mainly to ensure the functioning of the internal market as defined in Article 26 TFEU. Harmonisation is thus inextricably linked to substantive aims of an economic nature, which are again embedded in wider social, environmental...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information