Table of Contents

Research Handbook on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law

Research Handbook on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law

Research Handbooks in Human Rights series

Edited by Robert Kolb and Gloria Gaggioli

This fascinating Handbook explores the interplay between international human rights law and international humanitarian law, offering expert analysis on the increasingly complex issues surrounding their application in conflict areas across the world.

Chapter 7: Proportionality in the European Convention on Human Rights

Enzo Cannizzaro and Francesca De Vittor

Subjects: law - academic, human rights, public international law, politics and public policy, human rights, terrorism and security


In the classical conception, international human rights law constitutes a set of rules which establish limits to sovereign powers. From this perspective, proportionality has the function of determining a reasonable balance between States’ and individuals’ interests. A different conception is gradually emerging which tends to regard human rights as part of the basic collective values of the international community. In this conception, proportionality is gradually assuming the function of determining the contents of human rights through a constant process of interests- and values-balancing. In this process, individuals’ interests are balanced not only with States’ interests but also with other individual and collective values of the international community. The current chapter will focus on the process of transformation of proportionality, from a tool designed to operate in the State–individual relationship, to one which applies to the overall process of values-balancing underlying the dynamics of human rights in contemporary international law. This process will be observed through a study of proportionality in the European Convention on Human Rights, probably the most integrated system of human rights protection established thus far, and one which can serve as a model for the development of a more comprehensive system of protection. Derogation represents the clearest example of how proportionality can be used in order to balance human rights and prerogatives of State sovereignty – in particular, the most evident prerogative, which is typically the power, or even the duty, to safeguard the life of the nation in time of war or of other public emergency.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information