Entrepreneurship

Entrepreneurship

Theory, Networks, History

Mark Casson

In this important new book, Mark Casson argues that the fundamental significance of entrepreneurship requires it be fully integrated into core social science disciplines such as economics and sociology, as well as into economic and business history. This book shows how this can be done. It formalises the role of the entrepreneur as innovator, risk-taker and judgemental decision-maker, and relates these functions to the size and growth of the firm. Mark Casson discusses entrepreneurship as a form of strategic networking, showing how entrepreneurs gain access to established networks in order to source information, and then create their own networks to exploit this information. Applying these insights to historical evidence leads to a radical re-interpretation of key issues in economic and business history, including the emergence of trading companies, the spread of empires, the rise of the modern corporation and the globalisation of the firm.

Chapter 2: The Discovery of Opportunities with Nigel Wadeson

Nigel Wadeson

Subjects: business and management, entrepreneurship, economics and finance, economics of entrepreneurship

Extract

This chapter presents a conceptual framework that can be used to analyse the process of entrepreneurial opportunity discovery. An opportunity can be considered as a project whose exploitation would be advantageous to the entrepreneur. The entrepreneur has to use judgement in deciding which projects are most worth implementing. One important aspect of this is the question of how the entrepreneur is to apply judgement in deciding what information to gather, given the need to economize on the costs of doing so. 2.1 INTRODUCTION The concept of opportunity plays a central part in entrepreneurship theory (for example, Kirzner, 1979; Shane, 2003; Sarasvathy et al., 2003), though the term ‘opportunity’ has been employed in different ways by different writers, and this has created some confusion. Kirzner (1973), for example, suggests that opportunities are like dollar bills blowing around on the sidewalk, waiting for an alert individual to pick them up. Schumpeter (1934), by contrast, suggests that opportunities require large amounts of capital to exploit, and that the commitment to exploit them can be found only in minds of the highest order. When used in some contexts, ‘opportunity’ seems to signify merely an idea about how to earn a profit. In the economic literature, it often relates to an unexploited ‘activity’, but it remains unclear what sort of ‘activity’ this would be. The purely metaphorical nature of Kirzner’s example, and the very exceptional activity described by Schumpeter, reinforce this notion that the concept of opportunity is difficult to apply in practice. This chapter...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information