Table of Contents

Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume I

Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume I

Great Economists Since Petty and Boisguilbert

Edited by Gilbert Faccarello and Heinz D. Kurz

Volume I contains original biographical profiles of many of the most important and influential economists from the seventeenth century to the present day. These inform the reader about their lives, works and impact on the further development of the discipline. The emphasis is on their lasting contributions to our understanding of the complex system known as the economy. The entries also shed light on the means and ways in which the functioning of this system can be improved and its dysfunction reduced. Each Handbook can be read individually and acts as a self-contained volume in its own right. It can be purchased separately or as part of a three-volume set.

Chapter 49: Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk (1851–1914)

Carl Christian von Weizsäcker

Subjects: economics and finance, history of economic thought


Eugen Ritter von Böhm-Bawerk is best known to us for his theory of capital and interest. It will also be the main topic of this entry. Nevertheless, there are other relevant contributions of Böhm-Bawerk to economic theory and policy. Life Böhm-Bawerk was born on 12 February 1851 in Brünn (Brno) in the Czech part of the Austrian-Hungarian Empire. His father was a high civil servant. Böhm-Bawerk studied law in Vienna and then entered the civil service. He soon took leave to become an economist by studying in Heidelberg, Leipzig and Jena. In 1880 he obtained his Habilitation at the Faculty of Law in Vienna as a student of Carl Menger. His Habilitation thesis “Whether legal rights and relationships are economic goods” was published in 1881. In this he deals with the question of whether immaterial property like patent rights or goodwill positions in markets could be seen as part of net national wealth. In opposition to earlier writers such as Albert Schäffle and also to his own mentor Carl Menger, he gave a negative answer by emphasizing the similarity with loans which also could not be seen as part of net national wealth. The private value of such immaterial property rested on the fact that other people in the future will pay more for material goods than their cost of production. If these margins were considered to be paid above cost as a future burden of consumers, their capitalized value just cancels the capital...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information