Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume II

Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume II

Schools of Thought in Economics

Edited by Gilbert Faccarello and Heinz D. Kurz

Volume II contains entries on the major schools of economic thought and analysis. These schools differ with regard to their 'vision' of the working of the economic system, the major forces and interactions that shape its path, and the policy recommendations proposed. At any moment of time, several such schools typically compete with one another, striving for dominance within the economic and political discourse. Each Handbook can be read individually and acts as a self-contained volume in its own right. It can be purchased separately or as part of a three-volume set.

Chapter 21: Institutionalism

Malcolm Rutherford

Subjects: economics and finance, history of economic thought

Extract

The term “institutionalism” denotes a movement that was a major part of American economics during the interwar period, and is a tradition of economics that still exists today. As the name suggests, it is an approach to economics that stresses the central role of institutions in shaping economic behavior, and is usually identified with the work of Thorstein Veblen, Wesley Mitchell, Walton Hamilton, John M. Clark, John R. Commons, and Clarence Ayres, although many other individuals were, and are, involved. The explicit identification of something called the “institutional approach” to economics, or “institutional economics,” goes back to 1918 and to Walton Hamilton’s American Economic Association (AEA) conference paper, “The institutional approach to economic theory” (Hamilton 1919). Hamilton’s paper was deliberately a manifesto for an institutional economics. For Hamilton, this institutional approach was to be relevant to the problem of “social control” or the solution of social problems; related to institutions as the agencies through which the “changeable elements of life could be directed”; concerned with “process” in the form of an awareness of the constantly changing nature of institutions; and based on an acceptable theory of human behavior, one in harmony with the conclusions of “modern” psychology (Hamilton 1919: 312–14). Walter Stewart (Hamilton’s friend and colleague) chaired the session, and argued that economics needed to be “organized around the central problem of control”, should utilize the “most competent thought in the related sciences of psychology and sociology”, and combine “the statistical method and the institutional approach” (Stewart 1919: 319), a reference to his own and Wesley Mitchell’s quantitative work. J.M. Clark and William Ogburn also participated in the session. The organization of the session also involved Harold Moulton who discussed the idea with Veblen and Mitchell (Rutherford 2000a).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information