Comparative Tort Law

Comparative Tort Law

Global Perspectives

Research Handbooks in Comparative Law series

Edited by Mauro Bussani and Anthony J. Sebok

Comparative Tort Law: Global Perspectives provides a framework for analyzing and understanding the current state of tort law in most of the world's legal systems. The book examines tort law theories, rules and cultures. It looks at general issues at play throughout the globe, such as causation, economic and non-economic damages, product and professional liability, as well as the relationship between tort law and crime, insurance, and public welfare schemes. The book also provides insightful case studies by analyzing specific features of selected tort systems in Europe, USA, Latin America, East Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa.

Chapter 3: Tort law and conflict of laws

Symeon C. Symeonides

Subjects: law - academic, comparative law, law of obligations


The law of torts and the law of conflict of laws, or private international law (PIL), intersect whenever the particular tort or the parties have significant contacts with more than one state or country. Examples of such ‘multistate’ torts would include cases in which the tortious conduct occurs in one state and the resulting injury in another (cross-border torts), or in which the conduct and the injury both occur in one state but either the tortfeasor or the victim, or both, are domiciled in, or have another significant connection with, another state. This chapter explores the question of which state’s law determines the rights and liabilities of the parties arising from a tort: the choice-of-law question. It does not discuss the question of jurisdiction, namely which court will decide the dispute, nor the recognition or enforcement of the resulting judgment in another state. For much of the twentieth century, most countries answered the choice-of-law question in the same way: by applying the law of the state where the tort occurred, the lex loci delicti. However, beginning in the 1960s, the lex loci delicti rule, at least in its inexorable version, began losing ground. This chapter discusses the current status of this rule, its exceptions, and, in some cases, its replacement with other rules, methodologies, or approaches. The discussion begins with the United States, a country with a plurilegal and uncodified PIL system that has experienced a virtual revolution in the handling of tort conflicts.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information