Table of Contents

Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property

Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property

A Handbook of Contemporary Research

Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property series

Edited by Christophe Geiger

This wide-ranging Research Handbook is the first to offer a stimulating and systematic review of the framework for criminal enforcement of intellectual property rights. If counterfeiting constitutes an ever-growing international phenomenon with major economic and social repercussions, potentially affecting consumer safety and public health, the question of which are the appropriate instruments to enforce IP rights is a complex and sensitive one. Although criminal penalties can constitute strong and effective means of enforcement, serious doubts exist as to whether criminal sanctions are appropriate in every infringement situation. Drawing on legal, economic, historical and judicial perspectives, this book provides a differentiated sector-by-sector approach to the question of enforcement, and draws useful conclusions for future legislative initiatives at European, international and national levels.

Chapter 14: Shaping Chinese criminal enforcement norms through the TRIPS Agreement

Peter K. Yu

Subjects: law - academic, criminal law and justice, intellectual property law


Entered into force on 1 January 1995, the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) built into the international intellectual property regime a set of comprehensive multilateral norms on intellectual property enforcement. The Agreement became ‘the first international [intellectual property] treaty to include provisions that deal with domestic criminal procedures and remedies’. Article 61 of the TRIPS Agreement specifically requires members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) to ‘provide for criminal procedures and penalties to be applied at least in cases of wilful trademark counterfeiting or copyright piracy on a commercial scale’. Shortly after the adoption of the TRIPS Agreement, international bureaucrats, government policymakers, industry representatives, and academic commentators quickly extolled the benefits of having a wide set of international intellectual property enforcement standards. A decade later, however, developed countries and their supportive industries began to complain about the inadequacy and ineffectiveness of these standards. They have also pushed aggressively for the establishment of new and higher standards through bilateral, plurilateral, and regional trade agreements, including the recently adopted yet highly controversial Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information