Table of Contents

Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property

Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property

A Handbook of Contemporary Research

Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property series

Edited by Christophe Geiger

This wide-ranging Research Handbook is the first to offer a stimulating and systematic review of the framework for criminal enforcement of intellectual property rights. If counterfeiting constitutes an ever-growing international phenomenon with major economic and social repercussions, potentially affecting consumer safety and public health, the question of which are the appropriate instruments to enforce IP rights is a complex and sensitive one. Although criminal penalties can constitute strong and effective means of enforcement, serious doubts exist as to whether criminal sanctions are appropriate in every infringement situation. Drawing on legal, economic, historical and judicial perspectives, this book provides a differentiated sector-by-sector approach to the question of enforcement, and draws useful conclusions for future legislative initiatives at European, international and national levels.

Chapter 17: Strategies against counterfeiting of drugs: a comparative criminal law study

Hans-Georg Koch

Subjects: law - academic, criminal law and justice, intellectual property law

Extract

If the following report on a comparative criminal law research project deals with the phenomenon of drug counterfeiting within the framework of an IP Enforcement Congress, this does not take place with an absolutely clear conscience. The reason is that the main research focus of this particular project was not on the protection of intellectual property. Instead, the deciding factor for this study was the threat to life and health of the consumer that is posed by counterfeit drugs. Indeed, a leader of a drug regulatory agency has been cited as follows: ‘Counterfeiting medicines is just a commercial violation, like counterfeiting a T-shirt’. But in view of the many cases in which persons have died as a result of counterfeit drugs or suffered considerable damage to their health, the World Health Organization (WHO) surely meets with approval when it counters: ‘It is not an IP issue, it is a health issue’. As is often the case, the truth lies somewhere in between. The protection of intellectual property and the protection of health are not two conflicting legal interests, but rather two sides of the same coin when it comes to counterfeit drugs: it is not only an IP issue, it is just as much a health issue. Ultimately, the protection of intellectual property has only to gain from the addition of other legally protected interests requiring the reinforcement of criminal law.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information