Table of Contents

Handbook of Creative Cities

Handbook of Creative Cities

Elgar original reference

Edited by David Emanuel Andersson, Åke E. Andersson and Charlotta Mellander

With the publication of The Rise of the Creative Class by Richard Florida in 2002, the ‘creative city’ became the new hot topic among urban policymakers, planners and economists. Florida has developed one of three path-breaking theories about the relationship between creative individuals and urban environments. The economist Åke E. Andersson and the psychologist Dean Simonton are the other members of this ‘creative troika’. In the Handbook of Creative Cities, Florida, Andersson and Simonton appear in the same volume for the first time. The expert contributors in this timely Handbook extend their insights with a varied set of theoretical and empirical tools. The diversity of the contributions reflect the multidisciplinary nature of creative city theorizing, which encompasses urban economics, economic geography, social psychology, urban sociology, and urban planning. The stated policy implications are equally diverse, ranging from libertarian to social democratic visions of our shared creative and urban future.

Chapter 21: Creative Environments: The Case for Local Economic Diversity

Pierre Desrochers and Samuli Leppälä

Subjects: economics and finance, urban economics, geography, cities, economic geography, innovation and technology, innovation policy, urban and regional studies, cities, urban economics, urban studies

Extract

Pierre Desrochers and Samuli Leppälä Whether specialization or diversity of economic activities should be a regional development policy goal is a long-standing debate (Rodríguez-Pose and Crescenzi, 2008). On the one hand, as Hoover and Giarratani (1984, chapter 12, non-paginated) observed in their classic textbook, regional economic diversification has long been viewed as a ‘“healthy” structural feature worth striving for’ although ‘the grounds for this view . . . have never been clearly articulated’. In their opinion, this case can ultimately be traced back to the assumptions that ‘a region with a diversified structure (many different kinds of activities and an absence of strong specialization) is necessarily less vulnerable to cyclical swings of general business conditions and demand’ and that multiple employment and investment opportunities create more opportunities for workers, entrepreneurs and investors, thus providing ‘a better chance for new kinds of business to get a start and to survive the hazardous years of infancy’. In the last two decades, however, Michael Porter’s (1990) influential cluster-based prescription managed to successfully reorient most local development officials’ goal towards regional specialization. More recently, the continual decline of poorly diversified regional economies once again reminded numerous policy makers of the dangers of putting all of one’s economic eggs in the same basket (Chapman, 2005). While the benefits derived from the geographical concentration of related firms are strong, our objective in this chapter is to expand upon the traditional arguments made on behalf of economically diversified regions by illustrating how such a setting inherently facilitates the...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information