Table of Contents

Handbook of Creative Cities

Handbook of Creative Cities

Elgar original reference

Edited by David Emanuel Andersson, Åke E. Andersson and Charlotta Mellander

With the publication of The Rise of the Creative Class by Richard Florida in 2002, the ‘creative city’ became the new hot topic among urban policymakers, planners and economists. Florida has developed one of three path-breaking theories about the relationship between creative individuals and urban environments. The economist Åke E. Andersson and the psychologist Dean Simonton are the other members of this ‘creative troika’. In the Handbook of Creative Cities, Florida, Andersson and Simonton appear in the same volume for the first time. The expert contributors in this timely Handbook extend their insights with a varied set of theoretical and empirical tools. The diversity of the contributions reflect the multidisciplinary nature of creative city theorizing, which encompasses urban economics, economic geography, social psychology, urban sociology, and urban planning. The stated policy implications are equally diverse, ranging from libertarian to social democratic visions of our shared creative and urban future.

Chapter 22: Does Density Matter?

Peter Gordon and Sanford Ikeda

Subjects: economics and finance, urban economics, geography, cities, economic geography, innovation and technology, innovation policy, urban and regional studies, cities, urban economics, urban studies

Extract

Peter Gordon and Sanford Ikeda Well-educated professionals and creative workers who live together in dense ecosystems, interacting directly, generate ideas and turn them into products and services faster than talented people in other places can. (Richard Florida, 2009) Since World War II, economic and demographic forces, possibly along with the consequences of earlier housing and infrastructural policies,1 have flattened the populationdensity gradient in metropolitan areas across the United States, while presumably reducing the vitality and dense social networks associated with most traditional city centres. In response, planning ideologies that are hostile to ‘unplanned’, low-density development and that seek to promote high-density, pedestrian- and environmentally friendly communities have been developed to combat these trends. But do scholars who study cities even understand the nature of cities well enough to formulate policies that impact cities in a positive way? Economists do know that institutions matter, that human capital is important, and it is almost a cliché that cities are ‘engines of growth’. All three of these views are thought to involve prompting the cultivation of ideas that contribute to entrepreneurship and innovation. But is our understanding of the relationship among cities, human capital and economic development sufficient to effectively guide top-down urban and regional planning? We argue that the work of F.A. Hayek and Jane Jacobs strongly suggests the answer is ‘no’. Specifically, studies at the metro level that purport to show a positive correlation between density and economic growth, and between density and the migration patterns of creative types, do...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information