Table of Contents

Brands and Branding Geographies

Brands and Branding Geographies

Edited by Andy Pike

Despite overstated claims of their ‘global’ homogeneity, ubiquity and contribution to ‘flattening’ spatial differences, the geographies of brands and branding actually do matter. This vibrant collection provides a comprehensive reference point for the emergent area of brand and branding geographies in a multi-disciplinary and international context.

Chapter 5: The Making of Place: Consumers and Place-affiliated Brands

Liz Moor

Subjects: business and management, marketing, development studies, tourism, economics and finance, regional economics, services, environment, tourism, geography, tourism, social policy and sociology, sociology and sociological theory, urban and regional studies, urban studies

Extract

Liz Moor INTRODUCTION: CONSUMPTION AS A SPACE OF PROBLEMS If one of the tasks of the social scientist is to sort and state problems (Mills 2000 [1959]), then the sphere of consumption ought to be a particularly fertile area for academic enquiry. Within both public and academic spheres, consumer culture is frequently regarded as problematic terrain – both in its own right and in its relation to issues of value, ethics and labour, to name just a few. As Daniel Miller (1998a) has noted, commentaries on consumption since Marx’s time have often been marked by a fear of ‘object domination’ and a concern that objects, and relations with objects, will supplant people. Such fears, he notes, have frequently been exaggerated, and often lack either historical or anthropological substantiation (see also Trentmann 2009); nonetheless, there is a continuing concern that societies are more ‘consumerist’ than they used to be, and that an exaggerated orientation towards objects – and especially objects accessed via the market – causes alienation, exclusion and feelings of inadequacy or even humiliation, which in turn are dangerous for the polity and the planet (e.g. Bauman 1990, 2007; see also Lury 1996). There are, however, a variety of perspectives on consumption. Anthropologists, for example, have tended to approach it in terms of a more general interest in the uses of material culture and in terms of the extent to which the activities of powerful institutions (whether private or public) are able to limit the ways in which people can use material culture...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information