Table of Contents

Brands and Branding Geographies

Brands and Branding Geographies

Edited by Andy Pike

Despite overstated claims of their ‘global’ homogeneity, ubiquity and contribution to ‘flattening’ spatial differences, the geographies of brands and branding actually do matter. This vibrant collection provides a comprehensive reference point for the emergent area of brand and branding geographies in a multi-disciplinary and international context.

Chapter 7: Consumer Capitalism and Brand Fetishism: The Case of Fashion Brands in Bulgaria

Ulrich Ermann

Subjects: business and management, marketing, development studies, tourism, economics and finance, regional economics, services, environment, tourism, geography, tourism, social policy and sociology, sociology and sociological theory, urban and regional studies, urban studies


Ulrich Ermann INTRODUCTION In her bestseller No Logo, Naomi Klein (2000) described a new mode of capitalist economy, in which consumption plays a fundamental role. Brands are seen as the central element of such ‘consumer capitalism’. This term has been used in popular criticism of globalization and capitalism, and also in academic publications, since the 1990s, for example in Lash and Urry’s Economies of Signs and Space (1994: 2). But what is new about this new capitalism? Klein says that the management motto ‘Brands, not products!’ has caused radical changes in the economy. She cites Phil Knight, the former CEO of Nike: For years we thought of ourselves as a production-oriented company, meaning we put all our emphasis on designing and manufacturing the product. We’ve come around to saying that Nike is a marketing-oriented company, and the product is our most important marketing tool. (Klein 2000: 44) The main function of brands is no longer to protect from imitation by marking origin, but to invent and render identities and lifestyles. Brands reflect an economy of signs, in which ‘the greater part of consumption is the consumption of signs’ (Slater 1987: 157) and consumption ‘must not be understood as the consumption of use-values, as material utility, but primarily as the consumption of signs’ (Featherstone 2007 [1991]: 83). However, the new mode of consumer capitalism dated by Klein to the early 1990s is seen much more in the reflexivity of consumer–producer relations, as Nigel Thrift (1997) stresses with the notions...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information