Building National and Regional Innovation Systems

Building National and Regional Innovation Systems

Institutions for Economic Development

Jorge Niosi

Following the demise of the Washington Consensus, developing countries are looking for new ideas to guide their development. This innovative book suggests taking seriously some of the findings of evolutionary economics and paying specific attention to the institutions that matter for economic development, particularly those related to science, technology and innovation.

Chapter 5: Building Systems of Innovation: Three Phases and Three Cases

Jorge Niosi

Subjects: economics and finance, economics of innovation, evolutionary economics, innovation and technology, economics of innovation, innovation policy

Extract

While innovation systems include various combinations of institutions, organizations, and policies, their raw material is always human capital. There have been many attempts to measure and theorize about links between human capital and economic development. Nelson and Phelps (1966) suggest that countries with more human capital might more easily absorb technical knowledge from abroad. Romer (1990) argues that human capital is the key input to the research organizations that generate technical progress. In a sample of 98 countries between 1960 and 1985, Barro (1991) shows that economic growth correlated positively with initial human capital; also, nations with more human capital had lower fertility rates and greater investment in physical capital. Frantzen (2000) reveals how human capital increases productivity, while Benhabib and Siegel (1994, 2002) develop the Nelson–Phelps analysis and suggest that the spillovers of international knowledge that developing countries receive directly depend on education rates. Yet divergences continue. In the Nelson–Phelps approach, education speeds diffusion of technology, while in the opposite approach, education is a factor of production (Krueger and Lindhal, 2001). As Benhabib and Siegel suggest, the policy implications of both perspectives differ markedly. If technology diffusion is not instantaneous and firms are heterogeneous, any catching-up policy must be patient and focus on the long term. If, in contrast, education is a factor of production and agents are rational, then companies will hire educated labour and increase productivity quickly. This is closer to Gary Becker’s original concept of human capital. Catching up would thus be fairly rapid...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information