Families, Care-giving and Paid Work

Families, Care-giving and Paid Work

Challenging Labour Law in the 21st Century

Edited by Nicole Busby and Grace James

This unique selection of chapters brings together researchers from a variety of academic disciplines to explore aspects of law’s engagement with working families. It connects academic debate with policy proposals through an integrated set of approaches and perspectives.

Chapter 10: Child Welfare and Work–Family Reconciliation Policies: Lessons from Family Law

Grace James and Thérèse Callus

Subjects: development studies, family and gender policy, law - academic, european law, family law, labour, employment law, law and society, social policy and sociology, comparative social policy, family and gender policy


Grace James and Thérèse Callus INTRODUCTION The true measure of a nation’s standing is how well it attends to its children – their health and safety, their material security, their education and socialisation and their sense of being loved, valued and included in the families and societies into which they were born. (UNICEF 2007) Work–family reconciliation policies seek to help workers participate in the labour market and care for dependent family members. Legislation is principally focused on enabling parents to provide care for their children through a variety of measures including maternity, paternity or parental leave provisions and rights to request flexible working arrangements. The legislation that exists in developing countries often highlights the need to achieve gender equality and/or facilitate parental choice, and whilst this ought clearly to guide policy formation it is nonetheless curious that children’s need to receive care from their parents (or other carers) features so little in the packages of rights on offer. At an EU level for example, relevant laws have been developed to promote reconciliation between work and family life primarily as a means to achieve equality between women and men (see Caracciolo di Torella in this collection and Caracciolo di Torella and Masselot 2010) and so children’s welfare is not a fundamental aim, per se, of policies instigated at this level. Even rulings of the Court of Justice (CoJ), which often pursues a purposive agenda in cases it hears, does not acknowledge the impact of its employment policies upon children’s...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information