Table of Contents

Handbook on Organisational Entrepreneurship

Handbook on Organisational Entrepreneurship

Elgar original reference

Edited by Daniel Hjorth

Organisational entrepreneurship represents an interdisciplinary field of research that relates organisation, entrepreneurship and innovation studies in new ways. This Handbook establishes the scope of this interdisciplinary domain, challenges our perception of relationships between organisation(s) and entrepreneurship, and asks new questions central to our capacity to describe, analyse and understand organisational entrepreneurship.

Chapter 9: Making the multiple: Theorising processes of entrepreneurship and organisation

Edited by Daniel Hjorth

Subjects: business and management, entrepreneurship, organisation studies

Extract

Organizational and entrepreneurship scholars are increasingly engaging with process theory in their theoretical and analytical work. In the last 30 years or more, entire academic careers have been built around the pursuit of a process perspective of organization, and around eff orts to fl esh out the by now enigmatic term ‘organizing’. To name a few, Karl Weick, Robert Cooper, Robert Chia, and Barbara Czarniawska have made crucial contributions, while institutional support comes from Haridimos Tsoukas, who has since 2005 re-invented the Greek Isles as places for intense philosophical exploration of process theory and for the emergence of so-called process organization studies. Such intensive encounters enable academic communities not only to support or even to institutionalize their unusual perspectives but also to notice and deal with the sometimes contradictory positions that are part of the quickly expanding range of various so-called process perspectives (Wood, 2002; De Cock and Sharp, 2007; Steyaert, 2007; Weik, 2011). Such tensions become visible when philosophical assumptions are closely scrutinized (Hernes, 2008; Weik, 2011) or when new conceptual language does not give rise to new research practices and classical ways of treating method are continued instead (De Cock and Sharp, 2007). Currently many of the contributions on process theory are oriented towards sensemaking, even when it is called a relative newcomer to process thinking (Hernes and Maitlis, 2010: 27).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information