Table of Contents

More Common Ground for International Competition Law?

More Common Ground for International Competition Law?

ASCOLA Competition Law series

Edited by Josef Drexl, Warren S. Grimes, Clifford A. Jones, Rudolph J.R. Peritz and Edward T. Swaine

In recent years, an impressive proliferation of competition laws has been seen around the world. Whilst this development may lead to greater diversity of approaches, economic arguments may promote convergence. The contributions to this book look at a number of the most topical issues by asking whether the competition world is turning more towards convergence or diversity. These issues include, among others, the changing role of economics in times of economic crises and political change, the introduction of criminal sanctions, resale-price maintenance, unilateral conduct and the application of competition law to intellectual property and state-owned enterprises.

Chapter 7: Competition Law Issues Concerning Related Markets and their Treatment under EU Competition Law

Thomas Eilmansberger

Subjects: law - academic, competition and antitrust law


Thomas Eilmansberger INTRODUCTION 1 Most products are useless on a stand-alone basis and depend on other products (or services) to fulfil their function. The mere fact, however, that a good can be used only together or in connection with another good does not as such impact on consumer choice and competition in the markets concerned. The situation may be different if such necessarily combined use makes significant demands on the design or functionality of one or both products in question. Such compatibility requirements frequently arise with regard to products (‘secondary products’) that are complementary in the sense that their purpose is to make another product or service (‘primary product’) function in a better way or at all.1 There appear to be basically two types of secondary product that have to meet such compatibility demands (typically created by certain technical properties of the primary product), namely (i) products that are destined to eventually either become an integral part of or be attached to another product,2 and (ii) products enabling another product to do its job and fulfil its basic function.3 It is obvious that such compatibility requirements, or more precisely, the resulting interfaces, have the potential to restrict access to the product markets concerned. That applies, in particular, if the interface can somehow be controlled by the maker of the primary product. It is thus not surprising that antitrust enforcement in the EU has often had to deal with practices, For an antitrust analysis from a US perspective see, e.g....

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information