Mirages of International Justice

Mirages of International Justice

The Elusive Pursuit of a Transnational Legal Order

Matthew Parish

Since the end of the Cold War there has been an explosion of international courts and tribunals that sit apart from domestic legal systems, yet they are often woefully inadequate for their stated purposes. This book explores common problems across these courts, and applies a constructivist theory of international relations to explain their operation.

Chapter 9: The Future of an Illusion

Matthew Parish

Subjects: law - academic, criminal law and justice, human rights, international economic law, trade law, public international law, politics and public policy, human rights, international politics

Extract

Some illusions evaporate when their contradictions are exposed. Freud predicted religion would gradually whither as society realised the vacuous intellectual basis on which the phenomenon was premised, and the primitive psychological needs it fulfilled. Human society would become sufficiently rational that a collective appreciation of the false role of religion would gradually emerge, and people would stop practising it. Freud made this prediction in 1927.1 With the benefit of 85 years of hindsight, it is far from clear he was right; considered on a worldwide scale, religious belief is as strong as ever. So it is with international law. While its stated benefits and rationale are revealed as illusory, it stands little prospect of declining as citizens come to perceive its manifest fallacies. The global polity has too much invested in this illusion for it to recede. If this book aims to expose error leading to the correction of wrongs, it cannot hope to succeed, for historical forces are against that course. The only thing this work can hope to do instead is glumly to chart the inevitable. This prediction distinguishes the constructivist thesis from the realist. Were the realist’s account correct, one might imagine international law would disappear, since it is a costly and periodically inconvenient irrelevance to those who have created it. The point can be pushed further: the realist has trouble explaining why international law was developed in the first place. The constructivist, by contrast, can harness the power of ideas to explain why international law was...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information