Comparative Competition Law

Comparative Competition Law

Research Handbooks in Comparative Law series

Edited by John Duns, Arlen Duke and Brendan Sweeney

Comparative Competition Law examines the key global issues facing competition law and policy. This volume’s specially commissioned chapters by leading writers from the United States, Europe, Asia, South America, and Australia provide a synthesis of how these current issues are addressed by drawing on the approaches taken in different jurisdictions around the world.

Chapter 7: Antitrust treatment of intellectual property rights

Michael A. Carrier

Subjects: law - academic, comparative law, competition and antitrust law


One of the most challenging and important issues in antitrust law today involves the appropriate treatment of intellectual property (IP) rights. By its very nature, IP grants its owners rights to exclude. How antitrust (or, as it is referred to outside the United States (US), competition) law should address such a regime is far from clear.This chapter first explains the tension between the laws. It next traces the history of the intersection in the US. It then discusses several types of activity that demonstrate the tension, focusing on the law in the US and European Union (EU), the jurisdictions that have most closely examined these issues. In particular, it analyzes refusals to license, conduct in the pharmaceutical industry including settlements between brand and generic companies and ‘product hopping’ to new versions of drugs, innovation markets, standard-setting (in general and in the smartphone setting), and patent pools. For the past century, the intersection of the antitrust and IP laws has presented difficult issues for courts and commentators. Although the two systems attempt to increase total societal welfare, they pursue this goal through different paths. The foundation of the IP system – the patent and copyright laws in particular – is the right to exclude. Such a right is designed to allow innovators to charge prices high enough to recover their investment costs and gain profits, thereby encouraging future innovation. The exclusion at the core of IP nonetheless may be punished under the antitrust laws.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information