Comparative Competition Law

Comparative Competition Law

Research Handbooks in Comparative Law series

Edited by John Duns, Arlen Duke and Brendan Sweeney

Comparative Competition Law examines the key global issues facing competition law and policy. This volume’s specially commissioned chapters by leading writers from the United States, Europe, Asia, South America, and Australia provide a synthesis of how these current issues are addressed by drawing on the approaches taken in different jurisdictions around the world.

Chapter 17: Latin American antitrust law and policy: An overview of three jurisdictions – Brazil, Chile and Colombia

Javier Tapia and Alexandre Ditzel Faraco

Subjects: law - academic, comparative law, competition and antitrust law


It has become almost a commonplace to say that, nowadays, more than 100 jurisdictions have adopted competition regimes. Within this context, Latin America is not the exception. So far, 22 countries have enacted national competition laws. Also, supranational competition statutes have been enacted within the framework of the Andean Community of Nations (CAN), the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) and the Mercado Común del Sur (Mercosur). Furthermore, several of these jurisdictions have recently amended their competition laws or are currently discussing the introduction of changes, with the aim of making the regimes stronger. At first glance, competition law and policy in Latin America seems booming. The microscopic reality is fairly different. There is a large disparity in how active and successful Latin American competition law regimes have been in shaping good policies and/or applying state-of-the-art legal and economic standards. In fact, most of them are ineffective. Although reasons vary, arguably a central one is the widespread reliance on the United States (US) and/or the European Union (EU) systems as main sources of reference for the creation or enhancement of competition regimes, without careful consideration of native realities. This goes against the general consensus on the idea that antitrust should be locally rooted, depending on the underlying economic conditions. The scarcity of comparative works focusing specifically on Latin American regimes may be negatively contributing to such trend.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information