Table of Contents

Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Climate Change

Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Climate Change

Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property series

Edited by Joshua D. Sarnoff

This innovative research tool presents insights from a global group of leading intellectual property, environment, trade, and industrial scholars on the emerging and controversial topic of intellectual property and climate change. It provides a unique review of the scientific background, international treaties, and political context of climate change; identifies critical conflicts and differences of approach; and describes the relevant intellectual property law doctrines and policy options for regulating, developing, or disseminating needed technologies, activities, and business practices.

Chapter 3: International law and institutions for climate change

Sanford E. Gaines

Subjects: environment, climate change, environmental law, law - academic, environmental law, intellectual property law

Extract

Public and private actions in response to climate change, at every level from businesses to intergovernmental cooperation, occur in the context of or against the backdrop of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which aspires to ‘prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system’. Governments and observers, industry and environmental advocates alike agree that the primary immediate goal for responding to climate change is to mitigate – that is, to reduce or avoid man-made emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), most importantly carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas) for electric power generation, industrial and commercial energy use, and transportation. The first phase of the most important set of international legal commitments to advance the mitigation goal under the Kyoto Protocol (Kyoto) focused on reducing GHG emissions of industrial countries by an average of 5 percent compared to 1990 by the end of 2012. The Parties to Kyoto agreed on a phase II extension at their 8th meeting during the 18th Conference of the Parties (COP18) to the UNFCCC in Doha in 2012, but key Parties to Kyoto phase I, including Canada, Japan and Russia, chose not to participate, so Kyoto’s future effectiveness became doubtful.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information