Evolution, Organization and Economic Behavior

Evolution, Organization and Economic Behavior

Edited by Guido Buenstorf

This new and original collection of papers focuses on the intersection of three strands of research: evolutionary economics, behavioral economics, and management studies. Combining theoretical and empirical contributions, the expert contributors demonstrate that the intersection of these fields provides a rich source of opportunities enabling researchers to find more satisfactory answers to questions that (not only evolutionary) economists have long been tackling. Topics discussed include individual agents and their interactions; the behavior and development of firm organizations; and evolving firms and their broader implications for the development of regions and entire economies.

Chapter 9: Economic Development as a Branching Process

Koen Frenken and Ron A. Boschma

Subjects: economics and finance, behavioural and experimental economics, evolutionary economics


Koen Frenken and Ron A. Boschma INTRODUCTION 1 The central question in economics has been, at least historically, the question of economic development (or ‘the wealth of nations’). Classical economists typically viewed this as a historical process of structural change, in particular as a process of modernization through industrialization. Later, the question of economic development was approached in a narrower sense by equating economic development with economic growth, namely, with upward movements in macroeconomic variables such as productivity, GDP, or export volume. Of course, it has always been known that the quantitative process of economic growth is accompanied by a qualitative process of economic development in the form of structural change in the industry composition of a country. However, the large majority of macroeconomists tended to assume that specific qualitative dynamics are of no interest to an understanding of economic growth. In more recent macroeconomic literature, the interest in structural change reappeared. For example, Harberger (1998) argued that the remarkable interindustry variation in productivity growth, and the changes therein over time, calls for theories that take the industry level seriously. He argued that the effect of broad externalities, for example, due to the growth of knowledge or human capital as central in new growth theory, is negligible compared to industry-specific productivity growth. Metaphorically, Harberger compared economic growth to the way mushrooms grow, where growth in particular industries can take place ‘overnight’, as opposed to growth likened to the way yeast grows, as implied by the new growth theorists. Others have...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information