Governance, Democracy and Sustainable Development

Governance, Democracy and Sustainable Development

Moving Beyond the Impasse

Edited by James Meadowcroft, Oluf Langhelle and Audun Ruud

The contributors explore the difficulties developed countries are experiencing in coming to terms with environmental limits and the resultant challenges to the democratic polity. They engage with different dimensions of the governance challenge including norms, public attitudes, citizen engagement, political conflict, policy design, and implementation, and with a range of environmental problems such as climate change, biodiversity/nature protection, and water management. The book concludes with an essay by William Lafferty that explores the flawed character of the contemporary democratic polity and offers his reflections on possible pathways to reform.

Chapter 9: Measuring what? National interpretations of sustainable development–the case of Norway

Oluf Langhelle and Audun Ruud

Subjects: environment, environmental politics and policy, politics and public policy, environmental politics and policy, public policy, regulation and governance

Extract

The concept of sustainable development was proposed by the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) as a guiding principle to steer global development (Lafferty 1996). Global concerns, however, have to be translated into regional, national and local settings. To be able to draw actual policy implications from sustainable development at the national level, there are a number of issues that must be (pre)determined. First of all these issues concern the question of what to translate. It is necessary to determine what sustainable development means, what should be included in the concept, and how different dimensions of sustainable development are to be measured and weighed. During the past two decades various political efforts have been undertaken to promote, measure and operationalize sustainable development. Numerous challenges still remain and there is as yet no common measure of sustainable development. This is hardly surprising. As a report issued by the UNECE/OECD/Eurostat Working Group on Statistics for sustainable development (United Nations 2008, p. 13) has argued, sustainable development is ‘difficult to define with precision and, therefore, difficult to measure’. Moreover, there is no agreement on how to measure global sustainable development. Stiglitz et al. (2009, p. 234) argue that ‘no indicator emerges as consensual, even among those that try to rely on a well-defined concept of global sustainability. Such a situation is obviously a source of perplexity. . .’. Therefore one of the major challenges of sustainable development remains at the conceptual level, concerning what it is and how it should be measured.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information