Conflict of Laws in the People’s Republic of China

Conflict of Laws in the People’s Republic of China

Elgar Asian Commercial Law and Practice series

Zheng Sophia Tang, Yongping Xiao and Zhengxin Huo

The area of conflict of laws in China has undergone fundamental development in the past three decades and the most recent changes in the 2010s, regarding both jurisdiction and choice of law rules, mark the establishment of modern Chinese conflicts system. Jointly written by three professors from both China and the UK, this book provides the most up-to-date and comprehensive analysis of Chinese conflict of laws in civil and commercial matters. It takes into account the latest developments in legislation and judicial interpretation, case law and judicial practice, and historical, political and economic background, especially recognizing the scholarly contribution made by Chinese scholars to this field.


Zheng Sophia Tang, Yongping Xiao and Zhengxin Huo

Subjects: asian studies, asian law, law - academic, asian law, private international law


Jurisdiction in this book only refers to adjudication jurisdiction, which is a court’s competence to hear a dispute. In international civil and commercial matters, a dispute usually involves elements that are located in more than one country. In most cases, the connections with more than one country may lead to a conflict of jurisdiction between the different countries. Although the international community has conducted extensive work to establish judicial cooperation and harmonize jurisdiction rules, it has made some but rather limited progress. Harmonized jurisdiction rules exist either regionally, or in a number of treaties concerning special matters in a piecemeal manner. China is not within any jurisdiction treaties. Jurisdiction in Chinese courts, thus, is largely decided by Chinese domestic law, which primarily demonstrates the national interest and international policy, instead of judicial cooperation with other countries in the world. Many Chinese jurisdiction rules, as a result, are remarked as exorbitant and excessive. However, after a 40-year ‘open door’ policy and intensive connections with foreign countries, Chinese jurisdiction rules have gone through gradual development and modernization. As in many other countries in the world, Chinese jurisdiction rules can be generally classified as ‘positive jurisdiction rules’ and ‘negative jurisdiction rules’. The positive jurisdiction rules refer to rules based on which the courts are empowered to assert jurisdiction. The negative jurisdiction rules provide the otherwise competent courts with the discretion to decline exercising jurisdiction.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information