Private Standards and Global Governance

Private Standards and Global Governance

Economic, Legal and Political Perspectives

Leuven Global Governance series

Edited by Axel Marx, Miet Maertens, Johan Swinnen and Jan Wouters

The expert contributors assess the state-of-the-art with regard to private regulation of food, natural resources and labor conditions. They begin with an introduction to, and discussion of, several leading existing private standards, and go on to assess private food standards and their legitimacy and effectiveness in the context of the global trade regime.

Chapter 3: Private Standards in Forestry. Assessing the Legitimacy and Effectiveness of the Forest Stewardship Council

A. Marx, E. Bécault and J. Wouters

Subjects: development studies, development studies, law - academic, regulation and governance


26/6/12/final 3. Private standards in forestry: assessing the legitimacy and effectiveness of the Forest Stewardship Council ´ Axel Marx, Emilie Becault and Jan Wouters 1. INTRODUCTION Forests are receiving increased attention from policy-makers and academics. The United Nations declared 2011 International Year of Forests and the European Union is currently preparing an extensive review of its forests policy and strategy. As a result, global forest governance is becoming a hot topic, as exemplified by a recent global assessment report on global forest governance by a set of leading political scientists and governance experts (Rayner et al., 2011). The report, Embracing Complexity: Meeting the Challenges of International Forest Governance, provides an extensive overview of the current forest regime and how it developed. It maps the different actors and initiatives involved and discusses the many objectives related to the governance of forests. Starting with the failure to agree an international forest convention in Rio in 1992, to the establishment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Forests (IPF) (1995–97) and Intergovernmental Forum on Forests (IFF) (1997–2000), to the formation of the UN Forum on Forests (UNFF), one can observe a failure of current multilateral initiatives with regard to forest governance. Dimitrov et al. state with regard to the UNFF that it is ‘explicitly deprived of a policymaking mandate’ (2007: 243). In parallel to the developments on the multilateral level one can also observe a rising contestation over this failure. Several NGOs started to protest heavily against deforestation and the destruction...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information