Table of Contents

Regional Integration, Economic Development and Global Governance

Regional Integration, Economic Development and Global Governance

Edited by Ulrich Volz

The contributors expertly provide a comparative perspective on regional integration in different regions of the world while at the same time analysing the various facets of integration, relating to trade, FDI, finance and monetary policies. They provide a comprehensive treatment of the subject and offer new perspectives on the potential developmental effects of regional integration and the implications of regional integration for global economic governance. Whilst highlighting and illustrating the potential benefits deriving from regional economic integration, the book also stresses the problems and challenges regional integration processes are usually confronted with.

Chapter 12: When You Got Nothing, You Got Nothing to Lose – Regional Monetary Integration and Policy Independence

J. James Reade and Ulrich Volz

Subjects: development studies, development economics, economics and finance, development economics, regional economics

Extract

* J. James Reade and Ulrich Volz When you got nothing, you got nothing to lose. Bob Dylan in “Like a Rolling Stone”, from the album Highway 61 Revisited 12.1 INTRODUCTION A central tenet of the literature on monetary integration and unification that is repeated like a mantra is that the costs of the latter are to be seen in the loss of monetary independence. The theory of optimum currency areas, which still guides economists’ thinking about monetary integration, maintains that countries that join a currency area by fixing their exchange rate to another currency (or even adopting another currency) will lose their monetary policy autonomy, and discussions are framed in terms of these costs. Countries that experience similar economic cycles and shocks, or which have adjustment mechanisms other than monetary policy or exchange rate revaluations to respond to idiosyncratic shocks, such as flexible labour markets, are hence deemed good candidates for a common currency area. In this chapter we do not seek to examine what constitutes an optimal currency area or which countries are good or bad candidates for joining it.1 Instead, we want to take a step back and reconsider the cost–benefit calculus of monetary integration relating to monetary policy autonomy. There is no question that a country that joins a monetary union will have to relinquish monetary sovereignty; but whether it loses monetary policy independence, that is, the ability to conduct its own monetary policy according to the developments of the domestic economy, is not clear per...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information