Agglomeration, Clusters and Entrepreneurship

Agglomeration, Clusters and Entrepreneurship

Studies in Regional Economic Development

New Horizons in Regional Science series

Edited by Charlie Karlsson, Börje Johansson and Roger R. Stough

Regional economic development has experienced considerable dynamism over recent years. Perhaps the most notable cases were the rise of China and India to emergent country status by the turn of the millennium. With time now for hindsight, this book identifies some of the key forces behind these development successes, namely agglomeration, clusters and entrepreneurship.

Chapter 11: Clusters and conglomerates in the media industry

Agostino Manduchi and Lucia Naldi

Subjects: business and management, entrepreneurship, economics and finance, economics of innovation, regional economics, innovation and technology, economics of innovation, urban and regional studies, clusters, regional economics


A fundamental but neglected issue in economic analysis is the account of the benefits of clustering. The benefits associated with clusters are oftentimes assumed to be self-evident (Maskell, 2001), and/or discussed in relation to market transactions among dispersed firms. Porter (1998, p. 80), whose work on clusters has become a standard in the field, does acknowledge clusters as an intermediate organizational form, standing between arm's-length market transactions and conglomerates. However, the benefits of clusters are almost exclusively identified by taking arm's-length market transactions as the benchmark: Compared with market transactions among dispersed and random buyers and sellers, the proximity of companies and institutions in one location-and the repeat exchange among them-fosters better coordination and trust. On a related note, standard economic analysis, based on optimizing choice, has historically played a marginal role in the study of clusters. However, since the early 2000s, a number of works have appeared, testifying that this situation may be due to the insufficient development of the analytical apparatus, rather than to intrinsic methodological weaknesses. This chapter addresses this analytical gap, by providing a framework within which clusters and conglomerates can be compared as alternative organizational forms. We focus on a stylized process in which productive ideas can be combined and translated into production opportunities by the individual agents.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information