Table of Contents

Handbook on the Economics of Women in Sports

Handbook on the Economics of Women in Sports

Elgar original reference

Edited by Eva Marikova Leeds and Michael A. Leeds

Women’s sports have received much less attention from economists than from other social scientists. This Handbook fills that gap with a comprehensive economic analysis of women’s sports. It also analyzes how the behavior and treatment of female athletes reflect broad economic forces.

Chapter 5: Gender differences in responses to incentives in sports: some new results from golf

Keith F. Gilsdorf and Vasant A. Sukhatme

Subjects: economics and finance, sports


Women and men make very different labor market decisions, which lead to different employment rates, employment patterns, and earnings. For example, women are underrepresented in many high-profile jobs, including those in academia and public administration. Research in psychology has reported that women and men gravitate toward different incentive systems; men are eager to compete, but women shy away from competition. More than men, women prefer to work under piece-rate systems in which rewards are based on absolute performance as opposed to tournament pay systems in which rewards depend on relative performance. Some of the early literature on this issue concluded that the earnings differences were caused by gender discrimination (Goldin and Rouse, 2000). Others claimed that women self-selected into jobs that did not demand large investments in human capital because they anticipated lower returns to such investment because they would leave the labor force (at least temporarily) after having children (Polachek, 1981). Over the last decade or so, economists and other social scientists have examined other hypotheses, among them the proposition that part of the gender pay gap arises from different reactions to prize incentives. Croson and Gneezy (2009) review experimental evidence on preference differences between men and women, focusing on three factors that have been extensively studied: risk preferences, social preferences, and reaction to competition. They find that women are more risk averse and more competition averse than men.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information