Entrepreneurship Education in Asia

Entrepreneurship Education in Asia

Edited by Hugh Thomas and Donna Kelley

The continuing success of the Asian Miracle relies on an entrepreneurial revolution that has increased the productivity and flexibility of economies across the region. Yet this revolution has largely been necessity-driven, traditional and vulnerable to erosion as the region becomes increasingly prosperous and well educated. How to educate the next wave of entrepreneurs is a pressing Asian question that resonates around the world and is the subject of this volume.

Chapter 6: Developing Intellectual Entrepreneurship Education Programs for Engineering and Science Students in Chinese Mainland Universities

Liu Lijun and Guan Sisi

Subjects: business and management, entrepreneurship, management education, education, management education


Liu Lijun and Guan Sisi* 6.1 INTRODUCTION Scholars are increasingly studying the effectiveness of entrepreneurship education.1 Within entrepreneurship education, intellectual entrepreneurship education (IEE) is an emerging, global trend in research universities. We lack feasible and effective methods to implement IEE, however, especially in Mainland China, where professional faculties of research universities have little idea about how to integrate scientific and technology entrepreneurship with knowledge creation and learning. We first need to be clear that there are major differences, as well as synergies, between IEE and traditional professional education. This requires a program design that is both feasible and effective in bringing IEE to research universities. This chapter describes such a program, the ThreeStage Open Process Intellectual Entrepreneurship Program (TOPIEP). Of course, implementing TOPIEP in research universities for engineering students involves overcoming some obstacles. 6.2 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN IEE AND TRADITIONAL PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION In stating that IEE should be feasible, we mean that IEE can be implemented either without breaking down the original educational system’s equilibrium or by setting up a new equilibrium which is a Paretoimprovement (i.e., an improvement where no unit is made worse off) over the university’s current equilibrium. Thus, feasibility means that there 136 M2795 - THOMAS TEXT.indd 136 23/11/2011 13:39 Developing programs in Chinese Mainland universities 137 Table 6.1 Main differences between IEE and traditional professional education Traditional professional education Discipline-based in an academic context Academic quality Academic peer review Systematic within each discipline Homogeneous Hierarchic and stable Academic researchers and instructors Intellectual entrepreneurship education (IEE)...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information