Social Policy in a Developing World

Social Policy in a Developing World

Edited by Rebecca Surender and Robert Walker

This volume provides a critical analysis of the challenges and opportunities facing social protection systems in the global south, and examines current strategies for addressing poverty and welfare needs in the region. In particular, the text explores the extent to which the analytic models and concepts for the study of social policy in the industrialised North are relevant in a developing country context. The volume analyses the various institutions, actors, instruments and mechanisms involved in the welfare arrangements of developing countries and provides a study of the contexts, development and future trajectory of social policy in the global South.

Chapter 2: The role of historical contexts in shaping social policy in the global South

Rebecca Surender

Subjects: development studies, development studies, social policy and sociology, comparative social policy, social policy in emerging countries

Extract

The emergence of new forms of social protection and welfare arrangements in developing countries has recently drawn attention to the extent to which the traditional frameworks and models of comparative welfare policy and advanced welfare capitalism are analytically applicable to the developing and transitional worlds of the South and the East. There are compelling grounds to argue that they are not. Gough et al. (2004) were among the first to direct our attention to the fact that the evolution of policies and activities oriented to welfare goals in the West has relied on several key factors that are largely absent in a development context: an autonomous, legitimized and capable state, a pervasive labour market and division of labour, robust financial markets and an established legal and judicial system – in short, a capitalist economic and a democratic political system. Key among these factors for the purpose of social policy analysis is the role of the state – both its capacity and its legitimacy. In a development context, it is recognized that the state has been historically weak in terms of institutional power (in particular, a mature and independent bureaucracy characterized by continuity, impartiality and expertise) and functional capability (the fiscal and human resource capacity of systems and staff) (Wood and Gough 2006). In the contexts of development and social policy, the state is neither a primary agent for programmatic development and implementation nor an enabling structure providing infrastructural or regulatory support (Gough 2005; Kohli 2006).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information