Table of Contents

The International Handbook on Social Innovation

The International Handbook on Social Innovation

Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research

Elgar original reference

Edited by Frank Moulaert, Diana MacCallum, Abid Mehmood and Abdelillah Hamdouch

The contributors provide an overview of theoretical perspectives, methodologies and instructive experiences from all continents, as well as implications for collective action and policy. They argue strongly for social innovation as a key to human development. The Handbook defines social innovation as innovation in social relations within both micro and macro spheres, with the purpose of satisfying unmet or new human needs across different layers of society. It connects social innovation to empowerment dynamics, thus giving a political character to social movements and bottom-up governance initiatives. Together these should lay the foundations for a fairer, more democratic society for all.

Chapter 25: Reflections on the form and content of Participatory Action Research and implications for social innovation research

Len Arthur

Subjects: business and management, social entrepreneurship, development studies, development studies, geography, human geography, innovation and technology, innovation policy, politics and public policy, public policy, social policy and sociology, comparative social policy, sociology and sociological theory, urban and regional studies, regional studies, urban studies

Extract

The history of Participatory Action Research (PAR) raises issues relating to the relationship between the form of social research, i.e. methodological processes, and its content, i.e. phenomena, social context, values and purpose. Form and content issues have, in turn, implications for the emancipatory concerns of social innovation research with respect to the relationship of epistemology and methodology. This chapter will first review form and content issues involved in the historical experience of PAR and then, second, review the epistemic warrant of case studies and the extent to which PAR may make a contribution to this through the application of transitional demands and actions, which act as a bridge between the experience of social exclusion and the implementation of emancipatory possibilities.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information