Table of Contents

The International Handbook on Social Innovation

The International Handbook on Social Innovation

Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research

Elgar original reference

Edited by Frank Moulaert, Diana MacCallum, Abid Mehmood and Abdelillah Hamdouch

The contributors provide an overview of theoretical perspectives, methodologies and instructive experiences from all continents, as well as implications for collective action and policy. They argue strongly for social innovation as a key to human development. The Handbook defines social innovation as innovation in social relations within both micro and macro spheres, with the purpose of satisfying unmet or new human needs across different layers of society. It connects social innovation to empowerment dynamics, thus giving a political character to social movements and bottom-up governance initiatives. Together these should lay the foundations for a fairer, more democratic society for all.

Introduction: the pillars of social innovation research and practice

Serena Vicari Haddock

Subjects: business and management, social entrepreneurship, development studies, development studies, geography, human geography, innovation and technology, innovation policy, politics and public policy, public policy, social policy and sociology, comparative social policy, sociology and sociological theory, urban and regional studies, regional studies, urban studies


This part discusses the philosophical orientations, epistemologic stances and the role of the meta-theories of societal change which have proven most appropriate to the production of knowledge in analytical and empirical work on social innovation (SI). Its purpose is to provide a proposal to advance this work. In the first chapter of this part, Novy, Habersack and Schaller make a strong argument in favour of transdisciplinarity as the epistemological stance best suited to knowledge production, in particular in the analysis and promotion of social innovation; in doing so they also anticipate several theoretical positions presented in the following chapters. The argument is based on several propositions: first, the complexity of social problems and the highly disputed and recursive definition of their nature in contemporary societies make it necessary to take into account the plurality of both life-worlds and scientific definitions of problems.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information