Table of Contents

The Elgar Companion to Law and Economics

The Elgar Companion to Law and Economics

Elgar original reference

Edited by Jürgen G. Backhaus

This authoritative and comprehensive reference work introduces the reader to the major concepts and leading contributors in the field of law and economics. The Companion features accessible, informative and provocative entries on all the significant areas and breaks new ground by bringing together widely dispersed but theoretically congruent ideas for the first time.

Chapter 36: Karl Marx (181-83) and Friedrich Engels (1820-95)

Heath Pearson

Subjects: economics and finance, law and economics, public choice theory, law - academic, law and economics, politics and public policy, public choice


36 Karl Marx (1818-83) and Friedrich Engels (1820-95) Heath Pearson Introduction Karl Marx was born in Trier, a Rhenish town then belonging to Prussia. At the age of seventeen he entered the Faculty of Law at the University of Bonn; the year following, he transferred to the Law Faculty at the University of Berlin and, while he continued his training in jurisprudence there, he also pursued his interests in philosophy and history. In the end those collateral interests prevailed, and his doctoral degree was granted in philosophy. Thwarted in his career ambitions in the academy, the young Marx wrote for and edited several opposition newspapers. In 1842 he met Friedrich Engels, the scion of an industrial family, who was to be his lifelong collaborator and supporter. The two would spend most of the rest of their lives abroad, in England, France and Belgium, under conditions of explicit or self-imposed exile from their native Germany. Marx, always the towering figure of the pair (even after his death), read and wrote prodigiously, occasionally as a newspaper correspondent but more commonly as a freelance critic. In addition, he and Engels both tried their hand at political organization and communist agitation. Marx and Engels were not the first scholars to attempt an economic analysis of law; nor, arguably, were they the best. Neither one held an advanced degree in economics or in law and, as self-avowed revolutionaries, they were studiously ignored by most professionals in both fields. But their exclusion from nearly all retrospective...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information