Building Prosperous Knowledge Cities
Show Less

Building Prosperous Knowledge Cities

Policies, Plans and Metrics

Edited by Tan Yigitcanlar, Kostas Metaxiotis and Francisco Javier Carrillo

This unique book reveals the procedural aspects of knowledge-based urban planning, development and assessment. Concentrating on major knowledge city building processes, and providing state-of-the-art experiences and perspectives, this important compendium explores innovative models, approaches and lessons learnt from a number of key case studies across the world.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 1: Innovating: Creativity, Innovation and the Role of Cities in the Globalizing Knowledge Economy

Björn T. Asheim


Björn T. Asheim INTRODUCTION: THE URBAN TURNAROUND In the first decade of the 2000s strong evidence has been presented substantiating an argument for an urban turnaround taking place. While the discourse on industrial districts, clusters and new economic spaces dominated in the 1980s and 1990s (Piore and Sabel, 1984; Porter, 1990; Storper, 1997), in the 2000s focus has been directed towards cities as the node of new economic activities, new forms of collaboration and organization as well as the preferred location of the creative class (Florida, 2002; Storper and Venables, 2004; Asheim et al., 2007a). The academic discussions during the first decade of the 2000s have been characterized by a growing number of researchers arguing that the future competitiveness of advanced, developed nations will be built on diversity and variety and not on specialization. This runs against a traditional cluster policy, which is based on the exploitation of specialized localization economies. Krugman (2010) concluded that his New Economic Geography approach was not any more relevant for analysing developed economies as they had moved towards diversity as their primary competitive strength. (However, it was still useful in the rapidly growing, emerging economies, especially China.) Boschma and his colleagues (Boschma and Frenken, 2010) have demonstrated that firms and regions basing their activities on related variety are the most innovative and competitive. Lundvall and colleagues (Lorenz and Lundvall, 2006) have maintained that firms combining the science technology innovation (STI) and doing, using and interacting (DUI) modes of innovations perform best, and Laursen...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.