Any farmers group that gets together and verifies itself is unacceptable. Tom Harding, president,Organic Food Production Association (quoted in Burros, 1987) In response to increased production and consumption of organic foods, both Canadian and American governments embarked on formalizing organic agricultural standards into national policy in the late 1990s. Organic agriculture in both contexts came to be viewed by national governments as an economically valuable agricultural sub-sector that required public regulation and funding to expand (Haumann, 2010:183). To replace the patchwork of private certifiers, as well as various provincial and state regulations and standards, the US government passed legislation creating a national organic program in 2000, while Canada formally passed its national organic standards in 2009. Many actors welcomed the development of national organic standards as they are argued to give consumers a reliable, recognizable label by giving producers a standardized set of guidelines and regulations. Although regulating the production processes involved in organic agriculture is itself not new, the institutionalization of standards and principles into public policy in Canada and the US is a very recent development. What sets the institutionalization of rules surrounding organic food and agriculture in national public policy apart from prior forms of regulation is the ascendancy of the idea that organic agriculture should be regulated through a series of enforceable legal frameworks that, for the most part, do not include some of the substantive issues included in the process-based definition of organic, such as labor conditions or farm size.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.