Chapter 5: CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE SOLUTIONS ADOPTED BY THE VIENNA CONVENTION
Chapter 5 examines what happens to a BIT when the States concerned have not agreed (expressly or tacitly) on its continuation. In doing so, it critically analyzes the regime set out under the 1978 Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties for each specific type of State succession. It specifically assesses the soundness of the application in the principle of continuity, which has been adopted under the Vienna Convention for cases of secession and dissolution of States. This solution of automatic continuity is simply incoherent with the ILC’s position of tabula rasa adopted for Newly Independent States. In any event, it is plainly unjustifiable to adopt the principle of automatic continuity to bilateral treaties given the very particular nature of these instruments. It will be argued that bilateral treaties do not automatically continue to be in force unless both States concerned have explicitly (or tacitly) agreed to such a continuation.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.