Show Less
You do not have access to this content

Agents, Assumptions and Motivations Behind REDD+

Creating an International Forest Regime

Simone Lovera-Bilderbeek

​It was hoped that by paying forest dependent peoples and countries for their “service” of conserving their forests, REDD+ would lead to a reduction in deforestation greenhouse gases. The complexities have, however, left some ambiguities. It was never agreed who would pay for the program, and it has been criticized as ignoring the root causes of forest loss. Considering the motivations of those who promoted REDD+ this book proposes remedies to its shortfalls and recommends more efficient, equitable and effective conservation policies.
Show Summary Details
This content is available to you

References

Simone Lovera-Bilderbeek

Acheampong, E., Insaidoo, T.F.G. and Ros-Tonen, M.A.F., 2016. Management of Ghana’s modified taungya system: Challenges and strategies for improvement. Agroforestry Systems 90(4), 659–674.

Adekunle, V.A.J., Olagoke, A.O. and Ogundare, L.F., 2010. Logging impacts in tropical lowland humid forest on tree species diversity and environmental conservation. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 29(5), 517–538.

Agrawal, A., 2001. Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Development 29(10), 1649–1672.

Agrawal, A., 2007. Forests, governance, and sustainability: Common property theory and its contributions. International Journal of the Commons 1(1), 111–136.

Agrawal, A. and Gibson, C., 1999. Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development 27(4), 629–649.

Aguilar, S., 2007. Elements for a robust climate regime post-2012: Options for mitigation. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 16(3), 356–367.

Aldy, J.E. and Stavins, R.N., 2012. The promise and problems of pricing carbon: Theory and experience. Journal of Environment and Development 21(2), 152–180.

Alix-Garcia, J., Janvry, A. de, Sadoulet, E. and Torres, J.M., 2005. An Assessment of Mexico’s Payment for Environmental Services Program. University of California at Berkeley, USA and CIDE for the FAO Comparative Studies Service Agricultural and Development Economics Division, Rome, Italy.

Allan, J.I. and Dauvergne, P., 2013. The Global South in environmental negotiations: The politics of coalitions in REDD+, Third World Quarterly 34(8), 1307–1322.

Almeida, F. and Hatcher, J., 2011. What Rights? Measuring the Depth of Indigenous Peoples and Community Forest Tenure: Preliminary Findings from a Legal Analysis of 33 Forest Tenure Regimes in 15 Countries. Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington, D.C., USA.

Alvarado, L.X.R. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., 2008. Why Are We Seeing “REDD”? An Analysis of the International Debate on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation in Developing Countries. Analyses 01/2008. Institut du Développement Durable et des Relations Internationales, Paris, France.

Andam, K.S., Ferraro, P.J., Pfaff, A. and Sanchez-Azofeifa, G.A.A., 2008. Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(42), 16089–16094.

Andersson, K. and Richards, K.R., 2001. Implementing an international carbon sequestration program: Can the leaky sink be fixed? Climate Policy 1, 173–188.

Andersson, K., Lawrence, D., Zavaleta, J. and Guariguata, M.R., 2016. More trees, more poverty? The socioeconomic effects of tree plantations in Chile, 2001–2011. Environmental Management 57(1), 123–136.

Andresen, S., 2007. Key actors in UN environmental governance: Influence, reform and leadership. International Environmental Agreements 7, 457–468.

Angelsen, A., 2007. Forest Cover Change in Space and Time: Combining the von Thünen and Forest Transition Theories. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4117. World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.

Angelsen, A., 2008a. REDD models and baselines. International Forestry Review 10(3), 465–475.

Angelsen, A. (ed.), 2008b. Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.

Angelsen, A., 2010. Policies for reduced deforestation and their impact on agricultural production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(46), 19639–19644.

Angelsen, A. and Kaimowitz, D. (eds.), 2001. Agricultural Technologies and Tropical Deforestation. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Kanninen, M., Sills, E., Sunderlin, W.D. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. (eds.), 2009. Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.

Apgar, M.J., Allen, W., Moore, K. and Ataria, J., 2015. Understanding adaptation and transformation through indigenous practice: The case of the Guna of Panama. Ecology and Society 20(1), art. 45.

Arhin, A.A., 2014. Safeguards and dangerguards: A framework for unpacking the black box of safeguards for REDD+. Forest Policy and Economics 45, 24–31.

Arriagada, R.A., Sills, E.O., Pattanayak, S.K. and Ferraro, P.J., 2009. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate participation in Costa Rica’s program of payments for environmental services. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3–5), 343–367.

Arts, B., 2012. Forests policy analysis and theory use: Overview and trends. Forest Policy and Economics 16, 7–13.

Arts, B. and Buizer, M., 2009. Forests, discourses, institutions: A discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics 11, 340–347.

Arts, B. and Visseren-Hamakers, I.J., 2012. Forest governance: Mainstream and critical views. European Tropical Forest Research Network News 53, 3–10.

Asquith, N.M., Vargas Ríos, M.T. and Smith, J., 2002. Can forest-protection carbon projects improve rural livelihoods? Analysis of the Noel Kempff Mercado climate action project, Bolivia. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 7(4), 323–337.

Atmadja, S. and Verchot, L., 2012. A review of the state of research, policies and strategies in addressing leakage from reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 17, 311–336.

Aubertin, C., 2015. Deforestation control policies in Brazil: Sovereignty versus the market. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 24(3), 147–162.

Aukland, L., Moura Costa, P. and Brown, S., 2003. A conceptual framework and its application for addressing leakage: The case of avoided deforestation. Climate Policy 3, 123–136.

Aune, J.B., Alemu, A.T. and Gautam, K.P., 2004. Carbon sequestration in rural communities. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 21(1), 69–79.

Backstrand, K., 2004. Scientisation vs. civic expertise in environmental governance: Eco-feminist, eco-modern and post-modern responses. Environmental Politics 13(4), 695–714.

Backstrand, K. and Kylsater, M., 2014. Old wine in new bottles? The legitimation and delegitimation of UN public–private partnerships for sustainable development from the Johannesburg Summit to the Rio+20 Summit. Globalizations 11(3), 331–347.

Backstrand, K. and Lovbrand, E., 2006. Planting trees to mitigate climate change: Contested discourses of ecological modernization, green governmentality and civic environmentalism. Global Environmental Politics 6(1), 50–75.

Baker, J., Milner-Gulland, E.J. and Leader-Williams, N., 2011. Park gazettement and integrated conservation and development as factors in community conflict at Bwindi Impenetrable Forest, Uganda. Conservation Biology 26(1), 160–170.

Balmford, A. and Whitten, T., 2003. Who should pay for tropical conservation, and how could the costs be met? Oryx 37(2), 238–250.

Barr, C.M. and Sayer, J.A., 2012. The political economy of reforestation and forest restoration in Asia–Pacific: Critical issues for REDD+. Biological Conservation 154, 9–19.

Basnet, R., 2009. Carbon ownership in community managed forests. Journal of Forest and Livelihood 8(1), 77–83.

Bauer, S., Biermann, F., Dingwerth, K. and Siebenhüner, B., 2009. Understanding international bureaucracies: Taking stock. In Biermann, F. and Siebenhüner, B. (eds.), Managers of Global Governance: The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., USA, 15–36.

Bausch, C. and Mehling, M., 2006. “Alive and kicking”: The first Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 15(2), 193–201.

Bekessy, S.A. and Wintle, B.A., 2008. Using carbon investment to grow the biodiversity bank. Conservation Biology 22(3), 510–513.

Benessaiah, K., 2012. Carbon and livelihoods in post-Kyoto: Assessing voluntary carbon markets. Ecological Economics 77, 1–6.

Benjaminsen, T.A. and Svarstad, H., 2010. The death of an elephant: Conservation discourses versus practices in Africa. Forum for Development Studies 37(3), 385–408.

Bennett, M.T., 2008. China’s Sloping Land Conversion Program: Institutional innovation or business as usual? Ecological Economics 65(4), 699–711.

Bernauer, T. and Betzold, C., 2012. Civil society in global environmental governance. Journal of Environment and Development 21, 62–66.

Besten, J.W. den, Arts, B. and Verkooijen, P., 2014. The evolution of REDD+: An analysis of discursive-institutional dynamics. Environmental Science and Policy 35, 40–48.

Beymer-Farris, B.A. and Bassett, T.J., 2012. The REDD menace: Resurgent protectionism in Tanzania’s mangrove forests. Global Environmental Change 22, 332–341.

Biermann, F., 2007. “Earth system governance” as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Global Environmental Change 17, 326–337.

Biermann, F. and Gupta, A., 2011. Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: A research framework. Ecological Economics 70, 1856–1864.

Biermann, F. and Siebenhüner, B. (eds.), 2009. Managers of Global Change: The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., USA.

Biermann, F., Davies, O. and Grijp, N. van der, 2009a. Environmental policy integration and the architecture of global environmental governance. International Environmental Agreements 9, 351–369.

Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., Asselt, H. van and Zelli, F., 2009b. The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics 9(4), 14–40.

Bishop, J., Kapila, S., Hicks, F., Mitchell, P. and Vorhies, F., 2010. New business models for biodiversity conservation. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3–5), 285–303.

Bluffstone, R., Robinson, W. and Guthiga, P., 2013. REDD+ and community-controlled forests in low-income countries: Any hope for a linkage? Ecological Economics 87, 43–52.

Bodle, R., Donat, L. and Duwe, M., 2016. The Paris Agreement: Analysis, Assessment and Outlook. Background paper for the workshop “Beyond COP21: What Does Paris Mean for Future Climate Policy?,” January. BMUB, Berlin, Germany.

Bohmelt, T. and Betzold, C., 2013. The impact of environmental interest groups in international negotiations: Do ENGOs induce stronger environmental commitments? International Environmental Agreements 13(2), 127–151.

Bond, I., Grieg-Gran, M., Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., Hazlewood, P., Wunder, S. and Angelsen, A., 2009. Incentives to Sustain Forest Ecosystem Services: A Review and Lessons for REDD. Natural Resources Issues 16. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK with CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia and World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., USA.

Bonnie, R. and Schwartzman, S., 2003. Tropical deforestation and reforestation and the Kyoto Protocol. Conservation Biology 17(1), 4–5.

Börner, J. and Wunder, S., 2008. Paying for avoided deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: From cost assessment to scheme design. International Forestry Review 10(3), 496–511.

Börner, J., Wunder, S., Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., Rügnitz Tito, M., Pereira, L. and Nascimento, N., 2010. Direct conservation payments in the Brazilian Amazon: Scope and equity implications. Ecological Economics 69(6), 1272–1282.

Börner, J., Wunder, S., Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., Hyman, G. and Nascimento, N., 2011. REDD Sticks and Carrots in the Brazilian Amazon: Assessing Costs and Livelihood Implications. CCAFS Working Paper 8. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), Copenhagen, Denmark.

Borrego, A. and Skutsch, M., 2014. Estimating the opportunity costs of activities that cause degradation in tropical dry forest: Implications for REDD+. Ecological Economics 101, 1–9.

Bottazzi, P., Cattaneo, A., Crespo Rocha, D. and Rist, S., 2013. Assessing sustainable forest management under REDD+: A community-based labour perspective. Ecological Economics 93, 94–103.

Boucher, D., 2015. The REDD/carbon market offsets debate: Big argument, small potatoes. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 34(6–7), 547–558.

Boucher, D., Elias, P., Lininger, K., May-Tobin, C., Roquemore, S. and Saxon, E., 2011. The Root of the Problem: What’s Driving Tropical Deforestation Today? Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, Mass., USA.

Bouteligier, S., 2011. Exploring the agency of global environmental consultancy firms in earth system governance. International Environmental Agreements 11, 43–61.

Boyd, E., 2009. Governing the Clean Development Mechanism: Global rhetoric versus local realities in carbon sequestration projects. Environment and Planning A 41, 2380–2395.

Boyd, E. and Schipper, E.L., 2002. The Marrakech Accord – At the crossroad to ratification: Seventh Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Journal of Environment and Development 11, 184–190.

Boyd, E., Corbera, E. and Estrada, M., 2008. UNFCCC negotiations (pre-Kyoto to COP-9): What the process says about the politics of CDM-sinks. International Environmental Agreements 8, 95–112.

Boyd, E., May, P., Chang, M. and Veiga, F.C., 2007. Exploring socioeconomic impacts of forest based mitigation projects: Lessons from Brazil and Bolivia. Environmental Science and Policy 10, 419–433.

Bozmoski, A. and Hepburn, C., 2009. The Interminable Politics of Forest Carbon: An EU Outlook. Background Paper for Forest Carbon Finance Summit 2009: Making Forest Carbon Markets Work, Washington, D.C., March 6–8.

Bozmoski, A.S. and Hultman, N.E., 2009. Participant perceptions of risk and benefit in carbon forestry: Evidence from central Tanzania. Journal of Environment and Development 19(1), 4–27.

Brockhaus, M. and Angelsen, A., 2012. Seeing REDD+ through 4Is: A political economy framework. In Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W.D. and Verchot, L. (eds.), Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 15–30.

Brockhaus, M., Di Gregorio, M. and Carmenta, R., 2014. REDD+ policy networks: Exploring actors and power structures in an emerging policy domain. Ecology and Society 19(4), art. 29.

Brockhaus, M., Di Gregorio, M. and Mardiah, S., 2013. Governing the design of national REDD+: An analysis of the power of agency. Forest Policy and Economics 49, 23–33.

Brockington, D., Igoe, J. and Schmidt-Soltau, K., 2006. Conservation, human rights, and poverty reduction. Conservation Biology 20(1), 250–252.

Broughton, E. and Pirard, R., 2011. What’s in a Name? Market-Based Instruments for Biodiversity. Health and Environment Reports 8. Institut Français des Relations Internationales, Paris, France.

Brown, L.D., Ebrahim, A. and Batliwala, S., 2012. Governing international advocacy NGOs. World Development 40(6), 1098–1108.

Brown, M., 2010. Limiting corrupt incentives in a global REDD regime. Ecology Law Quarterly 37, 237–268.

Bruce, J., 2012. Identifying and Working with Beneficiaries When Rights Are Unclear: Insights for REDD+ Initiatives. Program on Forests (PROFOR), Washington, D.C, USA.

Bryan, B.A., 2013. Incentives, land use, and ecosystem services: Synthesizing complex linkages. Environmental Science and Policy 27, 124–134.

Bulkeley, H., 2000. Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 18, 727–748.

Cacho, O.J., Marshall, G.R. and Milne, M., 2005. Transaction and abatement costs of carbon-sink projects in developing countries. Environment and Development Economics 10, 597–614.

Cacho, O.J., Milne, S., Gonzalez, R. and Tacconi, L., 2014. Benefits and costs of deforestation by smallholders: Implications for forest conservation and climate policy. Ecological Economics 107, 321–332.

Cacho, O.J., Wise, R.M. and MacDicken, K.G., 2004. Carbon monitoring costs and their effects on incentives to sequester carbon through forestry. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 154, 273–293.

Cadman, T. and Maraseni, T., 2013. More equal than others? A comparative analysis of state and non-state perceptions of interest representation and decision-making in REDD+ negotiations. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 26(3), 214–230.

Cain, Z. and Lovejoy, S., 2004. History and outlook for farm bill conservation programs. Choices (American Agricultural Economics Association), 4th Quarter, 37–42.

Campbell, B.M., 2009. Beyond Copenhagen: REDD+, agriculture, adaptation strategies and poverty. Global Environmental Change 19, 397–399.

Caplow, S., Jagger, P., Lawlor, K. and Sills, E., 2011. Evaluating land use and livelihood impacts of early forest carbon projects: Lessons for learning about REDD+. Environmental Science and Policy 14(2), 152–167.

Cashore, B., Galloway, G., Cubbage, F., Humphreys, D., Katila, P., Levin, K., Maryudi, A. et al., 2010. Ability of institutions to address new challenges. In Mery, G., Katila, P., Galloway, G., Alfaro, R., Kanninen, M., Lobovikov, M. and Varjo, J. (eds.), Forests and Society: Responding to Global Drivers of Change. IUFRO World Series 25. International Union of Forest Research Organizations, Tampere, Finland, 441–485.

Castillo-Santiago, M.A., Hellier, A., Tipper, R. and Jong, B.H.J. de, 2007. Carbon emissions from land-use change: An analysis of causal factors in Chiapas, Mexico. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12, 1213–1235.

Cattaneo, A., Lubowski, R., Busch, J., Creed, A., Strassburg, B., Boltz, F. and Ashton, R., 2010. On international equity in reducing emissions from deforestation. Environmental Science and Policy 13, 742–753.

Cenamo, M.C. and Carrero, G.C., 2012. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) in Apuí, Southern Amazonas: Challenges and caveats related to land tenure and governance in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 31(4–5), 445–468.

Cerbu, G.A., Swallow, B.M. and Thompson, D.Y., 2011. Locating REDD: A global survey and analysis of REDD readiness and demonstration activities. Environmental Science and Policy 14, 168–180.

Chandrasekharan Behr, D., Cunningham, E.M., Kajembe, G., Mbeyale, G., Nsita, S. and Rosenbaum, K.L., 2012. Benefit Sharing in Practice: Insights for REDD+ Initiatives. Program on Forests (PROFOR), Washington, D.C., USA.

Charnley, S., 2005. Industrial plantation forestry. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 21(4), 35–57.

Chen, X., Lupi, F., Vina, A., He, G. and Liu, J., 2010. Using cost-effective targeting to enhance the efficiency of conservation investments in payments for ecosystem services. Conservation Biology 24(6), 1469–1478.

Chester, C.C. and Moomaw, W.R., 2008. A taxonomy of collaborative governance: A guide to understanding the diversity of international and domestic conservation accords. International Environmental Agreements 8, 187–206.

Chomba, S., Kariuki, J., Lund, J.F. and Sinclair, F., 2016. Roots of inequity: How the implementation of REDD+ reinforces past injustices. Land Use Policy 50, 202–213.

Chomitz, K.M., 2002. Baseline, leakage and measurement issues: How do forestry and energy projects compare? Climate Policy 2, 35–49.

Chomitz, K.M. with Buys, P., De Luca, G., Thomas, T.S. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., 2007. At Loggerheads? Agricultural Expansion, Poverty Reduction, and Environment in the Tropical Forests. Policy Research Report. World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.

Choumert, J., Combes Motel, P. and Dakpo, H.K., 2013. Is the environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation a threatened theory? A meta-analysis of the literature. Ecological Economics 90, 19–28.

Coad, L., Campbell, A., Miles, L. and Humphries, K., 2008. The Costs and Benefits of Protected Areas for Local Livelihoods: A Review of the Current Literature. Working Paper. UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK.

Cock, A.R., 2008. Tropical forests in the global states system. International Affairs 84(2), 315–333.

Colfer, C.J.P., 2011. Marginalized forest peoples’ perceptions of the legitimacy of governance: An exploration. World Development 39(12), 2147–2164.

Combes Motel, P., Pirard, R. and Combes, J.-L., 2009. A methodology to estimate impacts of domestic policies on deforestation: Compensated successful efforts for “avoided deforestation” (REDD). Ecological Economics 68, 680–691.

Contreras-Hermosilla, A., 2000. The Underlying Causes of Forest Decline. Occasional Paper 30. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.

Cooley, D.M., Galik, C.S., Holmes, T.P., Kousky, C. and Cooke, R.M., 2012. Managing dependencies in forest offset projects: Toward a more complete evaluation of reversal risk. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 17, 17–24.

Coomes, O.T., Grimard, F., Potvin, C. and Sima, P., 2008. The fate of the tropical forest: Carbon or cattle? Ecological Economics 65(2), 207–212.

Corbera, E. and Brown, K., 2008. Building institutions to trade ecosystem services: Marketing forest carbon in Mexico. World Development 36(10), 1956–1979.

Corbera, E. and Schroeder, H., 2011. Governing and implementing REDD+. Environmental Science and Policy 14, 89–99.

Corbera, E., Estrada, M. and Brown, K., 2010. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries: Revisiting the assumptions. Climate Change 100, 355–388.

Corbera, E., Gonzalez Soberanis, C. and Brown, K., 2009. Institutional dimensions of payments for ecosystem services: An analysis of Mexico’s carbon forestry programme. Ecological Economics 68(3), 743–761.

Crossman, N.D., Bryan, B.A. and Summers, D.M., 2011. Carbon payments and low-cost conservation. Conservation Biology 25(4), 835–845.

Daniels, A.E., Bagstad, K., Esposito, V., Moulaert, A. and Rodriguez, C.M., 2010. Understanding the impacts of Costa Rica’s PES: Are we asking the right questions? Ecological Economics 69, 2116–2126.

Dargusch, P., Lawrence, K., Herbohn, J. and Medrilzam, 2010. A small-scale forestry perspective on constraints to including REDD in international carbon markets. Small-Scale Forestry 9, 485–499.

Daviet, F., 2009. Improving LULUCF offset projects: A carbon performance standard and ecosystem services. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3–5), 481–496.

Dellas, E., Pattberg, P. and Betsill, M., 2011. Agency in earth system governance: Refining a research agenda. International Environmental Agreements 11, 85–98.

Di Gregorio, M., 2012. Networking in environmental movement organisation coalitions: Interest, values or discourse? Environmental Politics 21(1), 1–25.

Dingwerth, K. and Pattberg, P., 2006. Global governance as a perspective on world politics. Global Governance 12(2), 185–203.

Doherty, E. and Schroeder, H., 2011. Forest tenure and multi-level governance in avoiding deforestation under REDD+. Global Environmental Politics 11(4), 66–88.

Dombrowski, K., 2010. Filling the gap? An analysis of non-governmental organizations’ responses to participation and representation deficits in global climate governance. International Environmental Agreements 10, 397–416.

Dryzek, J.S., 2005. The Politics of the Earth. Environmental Discourses 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

Dudley, R.G., 2010. A little REDD model to quickly compare possible baseline and policy scenarios for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 15, 53–69.

Dulal, H.B., Shah, K.U. and Sapkota, C., 2012. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) projects: Lessons for future policy design and implementation. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 19(2), 116–129.

Dutschke, M., 2010. Forestry, Risk and Climate Policy. Thesis for the University of Groningen. Cuvillier Verlag, Göttingen, Germany.

Dutschke, M. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. with Peskett, L., Luttrell, C., Streck, C. and Brown, J., 2008. Financing REDD: Linking Country Needs and Financing Sources. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.

Eisenhardt, K.M., 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14(1), 57–74.

Ekins, P., Kesicki, F. and Smith, A.Z.P., 2011. Marginal Abatement Cost Curves: A Call for Caution. UCL Energy Institute, University College London, UK.

Elias, P.E., 2013. How can we incentivize tropical forest restoration? Journal of Sustainable Forestry 32(7), 694–701.

Eliasch, J., 2008. Climate Change: Financing Global Forests: The Eliasch Review. Office of Climate Change, London, UK.

Engel, S., Pagiola, S. and Wunder, S., 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological Economics 65(4), 663–674.

Eyckmans, J. and Finus, M., 2007. Measures to enhance the success of global climate treaties. International Environmental Agreements 7, 73–97.

Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Börner, J., Violato-Espada, A.L., Nascimento, N. and Piketty, M.G., 2011. Forest loss and management in land reform settlements: Implications for REDD governance in the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Science and Policy 14, 188–200.

Faeth, P., Cort, C. and Livernash, R., 1994. Evaluating the Carbon Sequestration Benefits of Forestry Projects in Developing Countries. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., USA.

FAO, 1998. Forest Resources Assessment (FRA) 2000 Terms and Definitions. FRA Working Paper 1. FAO, Rome, Italy.

FAO, 2007. Gender Mainstreaming in Forestry in Africa. Forest Policy Working Paper 18. FAO, Rome, Italy.

FAO, 2010. State of the World’s Forests 2009. FAO, Rome, Italy.

FAO, 2015. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. FAO, Rome, Italy.

FAO, 2016. Forty Years of Community-Based Forestry: A Review of Its Extent and Effectiveness. FAO, Rome, Italy.

Farley, J. and Costanza, R., 2010. Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global. Ecological Economics 69, 2060–2068.

Farley, J., Aquino, A., Daniels, A., Moulaert, A., Lee, D. and Krause, A., 2010. Global mechanisms for sustaining and enhancing PES schemes. Ecological Economics 69, 2075–2084.

Ferraro, P.J., 2011. The future of payments for environmental services. Conservation Biology 25(6), 1134–1138.

Fletcher, R., Dressler, W., Büscher, B. and Anderson, Z.R., 2016. Questioning REDD+ and the future of market-based conservation. Conservation Biology 30(3), 673–675.

Forner, C., Blaser, J., Jotzo, F. and Robledo, C., 2006. Keeping the forest for the climate’s sake: Avoiding deforestation in developing countries under the UNFCCC. Climate Policy 6, 2–20.

Forsyth, T., 2007. Are environmental social movements socially exclusive? An historical study from Thailand. World Development 35(12), 2110–2130.

Fosci, M., 2013. Balance sheet in the REDD+: Are global estimates measuring the wrong costs? Ecological Economics 89, 196–200.

Fosci, M., 2014. The economic case for prioritizing governance over financial incentives in REDD+. Climate Policy 13(2), 170–190.

Fritzen, S.A., 2007. Can the design of community-driven development reduce the risk of elite capture? Evidence from Indonesia. World Development 35(8), 1359–1375.

Fry, I., 2002. Twists and turns in the jungle: Exploring the evolution of land use, land use change and forestry decisions within the Kyoto Protocol. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 11(2), 159–168.

Fry, I., 2007. More twists, turns and stumbles in the jungle: A further exploration of the evolution of land use, land use change and forestry decisions within the Kyoto Protocol. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 16(3), 341–355.

Fry, I., 2008. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: Opportunities and pitfalls in developing a new legal regime. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 17(2), 166–182.

Fry, I., 2011. If a tree falls in a Kyoto forest and nobody is there to hear it, will it be accounted for? An insider’s view of the negotiations surrounding land use, land-use change and forestry for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 20(2), 123–138.

Gale, F., 1998. Constructing global civil society actors: An anatomy of the environmental coalition contesting the tropical timber trade regime. Global Society 12(3), 343–361.

Garcia-Amado, LR., Ruiz Perez, M., Reyes Escutia, F., Barasa Garcia, S. and Contreras Mejia, E., 2011. Efficiency of payments for environmental services: Equity and additionality in a case study from a biosphere reserve in Chiapas, Mexico. Ecological Economics 70, 2361–2368.

Gerber, J.F., 2011. Conflicts over industrial tree plantations in the South: Who, how and why? Global Environmental Change 21, 165–176.

German, L., Villamor, G., Twine, E., Velarde, S.J. and Kidane, B., 2009. Environmental services and the precautionary principle: Using scenarios to reconcile conservation and livelihood objectives in upper catchments. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3–5), 368–394.

Gibbs, H.K., Brown, S., Niles, J.O. and Foley, J.A., 2007. Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: Making REDD a reality. Environmental Research Letters 2, 045023.

Gillespie, A., 2006. Facilitating and controlling civil society in international environmental law. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 15(3), 327–338.

Goltz, J. von der, 2009. High Stakes in a Complex Game: A Snapshot of the Climate Change Negotiating Positions of Major Developing Country Emitters. Working Paper 177. Center for Global Development, Washington, D.C., USA.

Gomez-Baggethun, E., Groot, R. de, Lomas, P.L. and Montes, C., 2010. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics 69, 1209–1218.

Graichen, P., 2005. Can forestry gain from emissions trading? Rules governing sinks projects under the UNFCCC and the EU Emissions Trading System. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 14(1), 11–18.

Gregersen, H., El Lakany, H., Karsenty, A. and White, A., 2010. Does the Opportunity Cost Approach Indicate the Real Cost of REDD+? Rights and Realities of Paying for REDD+. Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington, D.C., USA.

Grieg-Gran, M., Porras, I. and Wunder, S., 2005. How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. World Development 33, 1511–1527.

Grondard, N., Loisel, C., Martinet, A. and Routier, J.B., 2008. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD): Analysis of 7 Outstanding Issues for the Inclusion of Tropical Forests in the International Climate Governance. ONF International, Paris, France.

Groot, R.S. de, Wilson, M.A. and Boumans, R.M.J., 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41, 393–408.

Grubb, M., Laing, T., Counsell, T. and Willan, C., 2011. Global carbon mechanisms: Lessons and implications. Climatic Change 104, 539–573.

Gsottbauer, E. and Bergh, J.C.J.M. van den, 2012. Bounded rationality and social interaction in negotiating a climate agreement. International Environmental Agreements 13(3), 225–249.

Gupta, J., 2003. The role of non-state actors in international environmental affairs. Heidelberg Journal of International Law 63(2), 459–486.

Gupta, J., 2005. Non-state actors in international governance and law: A challenge or a blessing. ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 11(3), 497–517.

Gupta, J., 2008. Global change: Analysing scale and scaling in environmental governance. In Young, O., Schroeder, H. and King, L. (eds.), Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., USA, 225–258.

Gupta, J., 2012. Glocal forest and REDD+ governance: Win–win or lose–lose? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4, 620–627.

Gupta, J., 2014. The History of Global Climate Governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Gupta, J. and Grijp, N. van der (eds.), 2010. Mainstreaming Climate Change in Development Cooperation: Theory, Practice and Implications for the European Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Gupta, J. and Sanchez, N., 2012. Global green governance: Embedding the green economy in a global green and equitable rule of law polity. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 21(1), 12–22.

Gupta, J., Grijp, N.M. van der and Kuik, O.J. (eds.), 2013. Climate Change, Forests and REDD: Lessons for Institutional Design. Routledge, London, UK.

Haggard, S. and Simmons, B.A., 1987. Theories of international regimes. International Organization 41(3), 491–517.

Hajek, F., Ventresca, M.J., Scriven, J. and Castro, A., 2011. Regime-building for REDD+: Evidence from a cluster of local initiatives in south-eastern Peru. Environmental Science and Policy 14(2), 201–215.

Hajer, M., 2006. Doing discourse analysis: Coalitions, practices, meaning. In Brink, M. van den and Metze, T. (eds.), Words Matter in Policy and Planning: Discourse Theory and Method in the Social Sciences. Netherlands Geographical Studies 33. KNAG and NETHUR, Utrecht, Netherlands, 65–74.

Hajer, M. and Versteeg, W., 2005. A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 7(3), 175–184.

Hallegatte, S., Bangalore, M., Bonzanigo, L., Fay, M., Kane, T., Narloch, U., Rozenberg, J. et al., 2016. Shock Waves: Managing the Impacts of Climate Change on Poverty. Climate Change and Development Series. World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.

Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P. and Rittberger, V., 1997. Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Hatcher, J., 2009. Securing Tenure Rights and Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD). Social Development Working Paper 120. World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.

Haug, C. and Gupta, J., 2013. Global forest governance. In Gupta, J., Grijp, N. van der and Kuik, O. (eds.), Climate Change, Forests and REDD: Lessons for Institutional Design. Routledge, London, UK, 52–76.

Hayes, T. and Persha, L., 2010. Nesting local forestry initiatives: Revisiting community forest management in a REDD+ world. Forest Policy and Economics 12, 545–553.

Headon S., 2009. Whose sustainable development? Sustainable development under the Kyoto Protocol, “the Coldplay Effect” and the CDM Gold Standard. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 20(2), 127–156.

Heaton, K., 2005. Mitigating environmental and social impacts of intensive plantation forestry. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 21(4), 75–96.

Hein, J., Adiwibowo, S., Dittrich, C., Rosyani, Soetarto, E. and Faust, H., 2015. Rescaling of access and property relations in a frontier landscape: Insights from Jambi, Indonesia. Professional Geographer 68(3), 380–389.

Hoehne, N., Wartmann, S., Herold, A. and Freibauer, A., 2007. The rules for land use, land use changes and forestry under the Kyoto Protocol – Lessons learned for the future climate negotiations. Environmental Science and Policy 10, 353–369.

Hoff, R. van der, Rajao, R., Leroy, P. and Boezeman, D., 2015. The parallel materialization of REDD+ implementation discourses in Brazil. Forest Policy and Economics 55, 37–45.

Holm, S.-O., 2015. A management strategy for multiple ecosystem services in boreal forests. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 34(4), 358–379.

Hovani, A. and Fotos, M., 2007. Policy alternatives to increase the demand for forest-based carbon sequestration. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 25(1–2), 99–117.

Huberman, D., 2009. World Heritage Sites and the integration of biodiversity into an international PES framework. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3–5), 456–480.

Huettner, M., 2012. Risks and opportunities of REDD+ implementation for environmental integrity and socio-economic compatibility. Environmental Science and Policy 15, 4–12.

Huitema, D. and Meijerink, S., 2010. Realizing water transitions: The role of policy entrepreneurs in water policy change. Ecology and Society 15(2), art. 26.

Humphreys, D., 2003. Life protective or carcinogenic challenge? Global forest governance under advanced capitalism. Global Environmental Politics 3(2), 40–55.

Humphreys, D., 2006. Logjam: Deforestation and the Crisis of Global Governance. Earthscan, London, UK.

Humphreys, D., 2008. The politics of “avoided deforestation”: Historical context and contemporary issues. International Forestry Review 10(3), 433–442.

Hunt, C. and Baum, S., 2009. The “hidden” social costs of forestry offsets. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 14, 107–120.

IPCC, 2002. Climate Change and Biodiversity. IPCC Technical Paper V. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya.

IPCC, 2006. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, vol. 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use, ed. Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T. and Tanabe, K. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. IGES, Hayama, Japan.

IPCC, 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report, ed. Pachauri, R.K. and Reisinger, A. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.

IPCC, 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report, ed. Pachauri, R.K. and Meyer, L.A. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.

Irawan, S., Tacconi, L. and Ring, I., 2013. Stakeholders’ incentives for land-use change and REDD+: The case of Indonesia. Ecological Economics 87, 75–83.

Jacquemont, F. and Caparros, A., 2002. The Convention on Biological Diversity and the Climate Change Convention 10 years after Rio: Towards a synergy of the two regimes? Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 11(2), 169–180.

James, A., Gaston, K.J. and Balmford, A., 2001. Can we afford to conserve biodiversity? BioScience 51(1), 43–52.

Jaung, W. and Bae, J.S., 2012. Evaluating socio-economic equity of REDD+ in a rights-based approach: Rapid equity appraisal matrix. Environmental Science and Policy 22, 1–12.

Jindal, R., Kerr, J.M. and Carter, S., 2012. Reducing poverty through carbon forestry? Impacts of the N’hambita Community Carbon Project in Mozambique. World Development 40(10), 2123–2135.

Jindal, R., Swallow, B. and Kerr, J.M., 2008. Forestry-based carbon sequestration projects in Africa: Potential benefits and challenges. Natural Resources Forum 32, 116–130.

Johns, T., Merry, F., Stickler, C., Nepstad, D., Laporte, N. and Goetz, S., 2008. A three-fund approach to incorporating government, public and private forest stewards into a REDD funding mechanism. International Forestry Review 10(3), 458–464.

Jong, B.H.J. de and Esquival Bazan, E., 2007. Application of the “Climafor” baseline to determine leakage: The case of Scolel Té. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12, 1153–1168.

Jong, B.H.J. de, Hellier, A., Castillo-Santiago, M.A. and Tipper, R., 2005. Application of the “Climafor” approach to estimate baseline carbon emissions of a forest conservation project in the Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, Mexico. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 10, 265–278.

Kaimowitz, D., 2008. The prospects for reduced emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD) in Mesoamerica. International Forestry Review 10(3), 485–495.

Kaimowitz, D. and Angelsen, A., 1998. Economic Models of Tropical Deforestation: A Review. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.

Karsenty, A., 2008. The architecture of proposed REDD schemes after Bali: Facing critical choices. International Forestry Review 10(3), 443–457.

Karsenty, A., 2009. What the (Carbon) Market Cannot Do … CIRAD, Paris, France.

Karsenty, A., 2012. Financing Options to Support REDD+ Activities. CIRAD, Paris, France.

Karsenty, A. and Ongolo, S., 2011. Can “fragile states” decide to reduce their deforestation? The inappropriate use of the theory of incentives with respect to the REDD mechanism. Forest Policy and Economics 18, 38–45.

Karsenty, A., Vogel, A. and Castell, F., 2012. “Carbon rights,” REDD+ and payments for environmental services. Environmental Science and Policy 35, 20–29.

Kasa, S., Gullberg, A.T. and Heggelund, G., 2007. The Group of 77 in the international climate negotiations: Recent developments and future directions. International Environmental Agreements 8, 113–127.

Kashwan, P. and Holahan, R., 2014. Nested governance for effective REDD+: Institutional and political arguments. International Journal of the Commons 8(2), 554–575.

Kindermann, G., Obersteiner, M., Sohngen, B., Sathaye, J., Andrasko, K., Rametsteiner, E., Schlamadinger, B. et al., 2008. Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(30), 10302–10307.

Kiss, A., Castro, G. and Newcombe, K., 2002. The role of multilateral institutions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 360, 1641–1652.

Kissinger, G., Herold, M. and De Sy, V., 2012. Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation: A Synthesis Report for REDD+ Policymakers. Lexeme Consulting, Vancouver, Canada.

Koellner, T., Sell, J., Gahwiler, M. and Scholz, R.W., 2008. Assessment of the management of organizations supplying ecosystem services from tropical forests. Global Environmental Change 18, 746–757.

Koning, F. de, Aguinaga, M., Bravo, M., Chiu, M., Lascano, M., Lozada, T. and Suarez, L., 2011. Bridging the gap between forest conservation and poverty alleviation: The Ecuadorian Socio Bosque program. Environmental Science and Policy 14, 531–542.

Kooten, G.C. van, 2009. Biological carbon sequestration and carbon trading revisited. Climatic Change 95, 449–463.

Kosoy, N. and Corbera, E., 2010. Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecological Economics 69, 1228–1236.

Köthke, M., Leischner, B. and Elsasser, P., 2013. Uniform global deforestation patterns – An empirical analysis. Forest Policy and Economics 28, 23–37.

Köthke, M., Schroppel, B. and Elsasser, P., 2014. National REDD+ reference levels deduced from the global deforestation curve. Forest Policy and Economics 43, 18–28.

Krasner, S.D., 1982. Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes and intervening variables. International Organization 36, 185–205.

Krause, T. and Nielson, T.D., 2014. The legitimacy of incentive-based conservation and a critical account of social safeguards. Environmental Science and Policy 41, 44–51.

Kuik, O.J., 2013. REDD policies, global food, fiber and timber markets, and “leakage.” In Gupta, J., Grijp, N.M. van der and Kuik, O.J. (eds.), Climate Change, Forests and REDD: Lessons for Institutional Design. Routledge, London, UK, 207–228.

Kuik, O.J., 2014. REDD+ and international leakage via food and timber markets: A CGE analysis. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 19, 641–655.

Kulovesi, K. and Gutierrez, M., 2009. Climate change negotiations update: Process and prospects for a Copenhagen agreed outcome in December 2009. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 18(3), 229–243.

Lahsen, M., 2005. Technocracy, democracy and US climate politics: The need for demarcations. Science, Technology and Human Values 30(1), 137–169.

Laing, T. and Palmer, C., 2015. Economy-wide impacts of REDD when there is political influence. Resource and Energy Economics 40, 107–126.

Larson, A.M., 2011. Forest tenure reform in the age of climate change: Lessons for REDD+. Global Environmental Change 21, 540–549.

Lasco, R.D., Pulhin, F.B. and Sales, R.F., 2007. Analysis of leakage in carbon sequestration projects in forestry: A case study of Upper Magat Watershed, Philippines. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12, 1189–1211.

Lawlor, K., Madeira, E.M., Blockhus, J. and Ganz, D.J., 2013. Community participation and benefits in REDD+: A review of initial outcomes and lessons. Forests 4, 296–318.

Lederer, M., 2011. From CDM to REDD+ – What do we know for setting up effective and legitimate carbon governance? Ecological Economics 70, 1900–1907.

Lederer, M., 2012. The practice of carbon markets. Environmental Politics 21(4), 640–656.

Leggett, M. and Lovell, H., 2012. Community perceptions of REDD+: A case study from Papua New Guinea. Climate Policy 12(1), 115–134.

Leimona, B., Noordwijk, M. van, Groot, R. de and Leemans, R., 2015. Fairly efficient, efficiently fair: Lessons from designing and testing payment schemes for ecosystem services in Asia. Ecosystem Services 12, 16–28.

Lejano, R.P., 2006. The design of environmental regimes: Social construction, contextuality, and improvisation. International Environmental Agreements 6, 187–207.

Lele, U., Kumar, N., Husain, S.A., Zazueta, A. and Kelly, L., 2000. The World Bank Forest Strategy: Striking the Right Balance. World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.

Lemaitre, S., 2011. Indigenous peoples’ land rights and REDD: A case study. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 20(2), 150–162.

Lesniewska, F., 2010. REDD: The Copenhagen effect. Law, Environment and Development Journal 6(1), 102–111.

Lesniewska, F., 2014. UNFCCC REDD+ COP decisions: The cumulative effect on forest related law processes. International Community Law Review 15(1), 103–121.

Levin, K., McDermott, C. and Cashore, B., 2008. The climate regime as global forest governance: Can reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) initiatives pass a “dual effectiveness” test? International Forestry Review 10(3), 538–549.

Liu, J., Li, S., Ouyang, Z., Tam, C. and Chen, X., 2008. Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China’s policies for ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(28), 9477–9482.

Livengood, E. and Dixon, A., 2009. REDD and the Effort to Limit Global Warming to 2°C: Implications for Including REDD Credits in the International Carbon Market. KEA 3, Wellington, New Zealand.

Locatelli, B., Rojas, V. and Salinas, Z., 2008. Impacts of payments for environmental services on local development in northern Costa Rica: A fuzzy multi-criteria analysis. Forest Policy and Economics 10, 275–285.

Lovbrand, E., 2004. Bridging political expectations and scientific limitations in climate risk management – On the uncertain effects of international carbon sink policies. Climatic Change 67, 449–460.

Lund, J.F. and Treue, T., 2008. Are we getting there? Evidence of decentralized forest management from the Tanzanian Miombo woodlands. World Development 36(12), 2780–2800.

Lyster, R., 2011. REDD+, transparency, participation and resource rights: The role of law. Environmental Science and Policy 14(2), 118–126.

Maraseni, T.N., Neupane, P.R., Lopez-Castro, F. and Cadman, T., 2014. An assessment of the impacts of the REDD+ pilot project on community forests user groups (CFUGs) and their community forests in Nepal. Journal of Environmental Management 136, 37–46.

Massai, L., 2010. The long way to the Copenhagen Accord: Climate change negotiations in 2009. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 19(1), 104–121.

Matthews, R., Noordwijk, M. van, Lambin, E., Meyfroidt, P., Gupta, J., Verschot, L., Hergoualc’h, K. et al., 2014. Implementing REDD+ (reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation): Evidence on governance, evaluation and impacts from the REDD-ALERT project. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 19, 907–925.

Matz, N., 2005. Financial institutions between effectiveness and legitimacy – A legal analysis of the World Bank, Global Environment Facility and Prototype Carbon Fund. International Environmental Agreements 5, 265–302.

McCarthy, S. and Tacconi, L., 2011. The political economy of tropical deforestation: Assessing models and motives. Environmental Politics 20(1), 115–132.

McDermott, C.L., 2014. REDDuced: From sustainability to legality to units of carbon – The search for common interests in international forest governance. Environmental Science and Policy 35, 12–19.

McDermott, C.L., Humphreys, D., Wildburger, C. and Wood, P. with Marfo, E., Pacheco, P. and Yasmi, Y., 2010. Mapping the core actors and issues defining international forest governance. In Rayner, J., Buck, A. and Katila, P. (eds.), Embracing Complexity: Meeting the Challenges of International Forest Governance. A global assessment report prepared by the Global Forest Expert Panel on the International Forest Regime. World Series 28. IUFRO, Vienna, Austria, 19–36.

McDermott, M., Mahanty, S. and Schreckenberg, K., 2013. Examining equity: A multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services. Environmental Science and Policy 33, 416–427.

McElwee, P.D., 2011. Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest conservation in Vietnam: Panacea or problem? Geoforum 43(3), 412–426.

McKinsey & Company, 2009. Pathways to a Low-Carbon Economy: Version 2.0 of the Global Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curve. McKinsey & Company, New York, USA.

McNeely, J.A., Miller, K.R., Reid, W.V. and Mittermeier, R.A.B., 1990. Conserving the World’s Biological Diversity. International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, Switzerland.

Melick, D., 2010. Credibility of REDD and experiences from Papua New Guinea. Conservation Biology 24(2), 359–361.

Mendelsohn, R.O., Dinar, A. and Williams, L., 2006. The distributional impact of climate change on rich and poor countries. Environment and Development Economics 11, 159–178.

Mertz, O., Müller, D., Sikor, T., Hett, C., Heinimann, A., Castella, J.C., Lestrelin, G. et al., 2012. The forgotten D: Challenges of addressing forest degradation in complex mosaic landscapes under REDD+. Geografisk Tidsskrift–Danish Journal of Geography 112(1), 63–76.

Michaelowa, A. and Michaelowa, K., 2010. Climate Business for Poverty Reduction? The Role of the World Bank. CIS Working Paper 59. Center for Comparative and International Studies, Zurich, Switzerland.

Milder, J.C., Scherr, S. and Bracer, C., 2010. Trends and future potential of payment for environmental services to alleviate rural poverty in developing countries. Ecology and Society 15(2), art. 4.

Minang, P.A. and Noordwijk, M. van, 2013. Design challenges for achieving reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation through conservation: Leveraging multiple paradigms at the tropical forest margins. Land Use Policy 31, 61–70.

Minang, P.A., McCall, M.K. and Bressers, H.T.A., 2007. Community capacity for implementing Clean Development Mechanism projects within community forests in Cameroon. Environmental Management 39, 615–630.

Minang, P.A., Noordwijk, M. van, Duguma, L.A., Alemagi, D., Trong, H.D., Bernard, F., Agung, P. et al., 2014. REDD+ Readiness progress across countries: Time for reconsideration. Climate Policy 14(6), 685–708.

Mitlin, D., Hickey, S. and Bebbington, A., 2007. Reclaiming development? NGOs and the challenge of alternatives. World Development 35(10), 1699–1720.

Mohammed, E.Y., 2011. Pro-Poor Benefit Distribution in REDD+: Who Gets What and Why Does It Matter? REDD+ Working Paper. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK.

Moltke, K. von, 2002. Governments and international civil society in sustainable development: A framework. International Environmental Agreements 2, 341–359.

Morel, A.C. and Morel, B.F., 2012. How could carbon credits for reducing deforestation compete with returns from palm oil: A proposal for a more flexible REDD valuation tool. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 31(1–2), 11–28.

Moreno, C., Speich Chassé, D. and Fuhr, L., 2015. Carbon Metrics: Global Abstractions and Ecological Epistemicide. Publication Series Ecology 42. Heinrich Böll Foundation, Berlin, Germany.

Morgera, E. and Tsioumani, E., 2010. The evolution of benefit sharing: Linking biodiversity and community livelihoods. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 19(2), 150–173.

Munden Project, 2011. REDD and Forest Carbon: Market Critique and Recommendations. Munden Project, New York, USA.

Murray, B.C., 2008. Leakage from Avoided Deforestation Compensation Policy: Concepts, Empirical Evidence, and Corrective Policy Options. Working Paper. Nicolas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University, Durham, N.C., USA.

Mustalahti, I. and Tassa, D.T., 2012. Analysis of three crucial elements of REDD+ in participatory forest management. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 27(2), 200–209.

Neeff, T. and Ascui, F., 2009. Lessons from carbon markets for effective REDD architecture. Climate Policy 9, 306–315.

Neeff, T., Göhler, D. and Ascui, F., 2014. Finding a path for REDD+ between ODA and the CDM. Climate Policy 14(2), 149–166.

Nelson, F., Foley, C., Foley, L.S., Leposo, A., Loure, E., Peterson, D., Peterson, M. et al., 2010. Payments for ecosystem services as a framework for community-based conservation in northern Tanzania. Conservation Biology 24(1), 78–85.

Nepstad, D.C., Soares-Filho, B., Merry, F., Moutinho, P., Rodrigues, H.O., Bowman, S., Schwartzman, S. et al., 2007. The Costs and Benefits of Reducing Carbon Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in the Brazilian Amazon. Woods Hole Research Center, Falmouth, Mass., USA.

Newell, P., 2012. Of markets and madness: Whose clean development will prevail at Rio+20? Journal of Environment and Development 21, 40–43.

Niles, J.O., Boyd, W., Lawlor, K., Myers Madeira, E. and Olander, L., 2009. Experience on the Ground, in the Forests. International Forest Carbon and the Climate Change Challenge Series Brief 6. Nicholas Institute, Duke University, Durham, N.C., USA.

Norgaard, R.B., 2010. Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological Economics 69, 1219–1227.

Nuzunda, E.F. and Mahuve, T.G., 2011. A SWOT analysis of mitigation of climate change through REDD. In Leal Filho, W. (ed.), Experiences of Climate Change Adaptation in Africa. Climate Change Management. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 201–216.

Okafor, O.C., 2006. Poverty, agency and resistance in the future of international law: An African perspective. Third World Quarterly 27(5), 799–814.

Okereke, C. and Dooley, K., 2010. Principles of justice in proposals and policy approaches to avoided deforestation: Towards a post-Kyoto climate agreement. Global Environmental Change 20, 82–95.

Okereke, C., Bulkeley, H. and Schroeder, H., 2009. Conceptualizing climate governance beyond the international regime. Global Environmental Politics 9(1), 58–79.

Olsen, K.H., 2007. The Clean Development Mechanism’s contribution to sustainable development: A review of the literature. Climatic Change 84, 59–73.

Olsen, N. and Bishop, J., 2009. The Financial Costs of REDD: Evidence from Brazil and Indonesia. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

Ostrom, E. and Nagendra, H., 2006. Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(51), 19224–19231.

Pagiola, S., 2008. Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. Environmental Economics 65, 212–224.

Palm, M., Ostwald, M. and Reilly, J., 2008. Land use and forestry based CDM in scientific peer-reviewed literature pre- and post-COP 9 in Milan. International Environmental Agreements 8, 249–274.

Palmer, C., 2011. Property rights and liability for deforestation under REDD+: Implications for “permanence” in policy design. Ecological Economics 70, 571–576.

Park, M.S., Choi, E.S. and Young, Y.-C., 2013. REDD+ as an international cooperation strategy under the global climate change regime. Forest Science and Technology 9(4), 213–224.

Partzsch, L. and Ziegler, R., 2011. Social entrepreneurs as change agents: A case study on power and authority in the water sector. International Environmental Agreements 11, 63–83.

Pattberg, P., 2005. What role for private rule-making in global environmental governance? Analysing the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). International Environmental Agreements 5, 175–189.

Pattberg, P., 2006. Private governance and the South: Lessons from global forest policy. Third World Quarterly 27(4), 579–593.

Pelletier, J., Busch, J. and Potvin, C., 2015. Addressing uncertainty upstream or downstream of accounting for emissions reductions from deforestation and forest degradation. Climatic Change 130, 635–648.

Pelletier, J., Kirby, K.R. and Potvin, C., 2012. Significance of carbon stock uncertainties on emission reductions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries. Forest Policy and Economics 24, 3–11.

Pereira, S. Novotny Couto, 2010. Payment for environmental services in the Amazon forest: How can conservation and development be reconciled? Journal of Environment and Development 19(2), 171–190.

Peskett, L., Huberman, D., Bowen-Jones, E., Edwards, G. and Brown, J., 2008. Making REDD Work for the Poor. Overseas Development Institute and IUCN, London, UK.

Peskett, L., Schreckenberg, K. and Brown, J., 2011. Institutional approaches for carbon financing in the forest sector: Learning lessons for REDD+ from forest carbon projects in Uganda. Environmental Science and Policy 14(2), 216–229.

Peters-Stanley, M., Hamilton, K., Marcello, T. and Sjardin, M., 2011. Back to the Future: State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets 2011. Bloomberg New Energy Finance and Forest Trends Ecosystem Marketplace, Washington, D.C., USA.

Peterson, A.L., Gallagher, L.A., Huberman, D. and Mulder, I., 2012. Seeing REDD: Reducing emissions and conserving biodiversity by avoiding deforestation. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 31(1–2), 29–58.

Pfaff, A., Robalino, J.A. and Sanchez-Azofeifa, A., 2008. Payments for Environmental Services: Empirical Analysis for Costa Rica. Working Papers Series. Terry Sanford Institute of Public Policy, Duke University, N.C., USA.

Phelps, J., Guerrero, M.C., Dalabajan, D.A., Young, B. and Webb, E.L., 2010. What makes a “REDD” country? Global Environmental Change 20, 322–332.

Pirard, R., 2012. Payments for environmental services (PES) in the public policy landscape: “Mandatory” spices in the Indonesian recipe. Forest Policy and Economics 18, 23–29.

Pirard, R. and Karsenty, A., 2009. Climate change mitigation: Should “avoided deforestation” be rewarded? Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3–5), 434–455.

Pollini, J., 2009. Carbon sequestration for linking conservation and rural development in Madagascar: The case of the Vohidrazana–Mantadia Corridor Restoration and Conservation Carbon Project. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3–5), 322–342.

Porras, I., Barton, D.N., Miranda, M. and Chacon-Cascante, A., 2013. Learning from 20 Years of Payments for Ecosystems Services in Costa Rica. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK.

Potvin, C., Guay, B. and Pedroni, L., 2008. Is reducing emissions from deforestation financially feasible? A Panamanian case study. Climate Policy 8, 23–40.

Prasetyo, F. Agung, Suwarno, A., Purwanto and Hakim, R., 2009. Making policies work for payment for environmental services (PES): An evaluation of the experience of formulating conservation policies in districts of Indonesia. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3–5), 415–433.

Putz, F.E. and Redford, K.H., 2009. Dangers of carbon-based conservation. Global Environmental Change 19(4), 400–401.

Putz, F.E. and Zuidema, P.A., 2008. REDD and reduced impact logging. In Holopainen, J. and Wit, M. (eds.), Financing Sustainable Forest Management. Tropenbos International, Wageningen, Netherlands, 155–158.

PwC (PricewaterhouseCoopers), 2012. Assessing Options for Effective Mechanisms to Share Benefits: Insights for REDD+ Initiatives. Program on Forests (PROFOR), Washington, D.C., USA.

Rayner, J., Buck, A. and Katila, P. (eds.), 2010. Embracing Complexity: Meeting the Challenges of International Forest Governance. A global assessment report prepared by the Global Forest Expert Panel on the International Forest Regime. World Series 28. IUFRO, Vienna, Austria.

Redford, K.H. and Adams, W.A., 2009. Payments for ecosystem services and the challenge of saving nature. Conservation Biology 23(4), 785–787.

Rendón Thompson, O.R., Paavola, J., Healey, J.R., Jones, J.P.G.R. and Torres, J., 2013. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+): Transaction costs of six Peruvian projects. Ecology and Society 18(1), art. 17.

Resosudarmo, I.A.P., Atmadja, S., Ekaputri, A.D., Intarini, D.Y., Indriatmoko, Y. and Astri, P., 2014. Does tenure security lead to REDD+ project effectiveness? Reflections from five emerging sites in Indonesia. World Development 55, 68–83.

Reynolds, T.W., 2012. Institutional determinants of success among forestry-based carbon sequestration projects in sub-Saharan Africa. World Development 40(3), 542–554.

Richards, K.R. and Stokes, C., 2004. A review of forest carbon sequestration cost studies: A dozen years of research. Climatic Change 63, 1–48.

Richards, M., 2000. Can sustainable tropical forestry be made profitable? The potential and limitations of innovative incentive mechanisms. World Development 28(6), 1001–1016.

Richards, M. and Jenkins, M., 2007. Potential and Challenges of Payments for Ecosystem Services from Tropical Forests. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK.

Robinson, B.E., Holland, M.B. and Naughton-Treves, L., 2014. Does secure land tenure save forests? A meta-analysis of the relationship between land tenure and tropical deforestation. Global Environmental Change 29, 281–293.

Roessing Neto, E., 2015. REDD+ as a tool of global forest governance. International Spectator 50(1), 60–73.

Ros-Tonen, M., 1993. Tropical Hardwood from the Brazilian Amazon: A Study of the Timber Industry in Western Pará. Breitenbach, Saarbrücken, Germany.

Ros-Tonen, M.A.F., Derkyi, M. and Insaidoo, T.F.G., 2014. From co-management to landscape governance: Whither Ghana’s modified taungya system? Forests 5, 2996–3021.

Rosendal, G.K., 2007. Norway in UN environmental policies: Ambitions and influence. International Environmental Agreements 7, 439–455.

Rosendal, G.K. and Schei, P.J., 2014. How may REDD+ affect the practical, legal and institutional framework for “payment for ecosystem services” in Costa Rica? Ecosystem Services 9, 75–82.

Royo, J., 2012. Agency and international relations: An alternative lens. E-International Relations. Retrieved January 3, 2014 from http://www.e-ir.info/2012/08/28/agency-and-international-relations-an-alternative-lens/.

Rudel, T.K., Defries, R., Asner, G.P. and Laurance, W.F., 2009. Changing drivers of deforestation and new opportunities for conservation. Conservation Biology 23(6), 1396–1405.

Salvini, G., Herold, M., De Sy, V., Kissinger, G., Brockhaus, M. and Skutsch, M., 2014. How countries link REDD+ interventions to drivers in their readiness plans: Implications for monitoring systems. Environmental Research Letters 9, 074004.

Sanchez-Azofeifa, G.A., Pfaff, A., Robalino, J.A. and Boomhower, J.P., 2007. Costa Rica’s payment for environmental services program: Intention, implementation and impact. Conservation Biology 21(5), 1165–1173.

Santilli, M., Moutinho, P., Schwartzman, S., Nepstad, D., Curran, L. and Nobre, C., 2005. Tropical deforestation and the Kyoto Protocol: An editorial essay. Climatic Change 71(3), 267–276.

Sasaki, N. and Putz, F.E., 2009. Critical need for new definitions of “forest” and “forest degradation” in global climate change agreements. Conservation Letters 2(5), 226–232.

Savaresi, A., 2012. The human rights dimension of REDD. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 21(2), 102–113.

Schaphoff, S., Lucht, W., Gerten, D., Stich, S., Cramer, W. and Prentice, C.I., 2006. Terrestrial biosphere carbon storage under alternative climate projections. Climatic Change 74, 97–122.

Schipper, E.L.F. and Boyd, E., 2006. UNFCCC COP 11 and COP/MOP 1: At last, some hope? Journal of Environment and Development 15(1), 75–90.

Schlager, E. and Ostrom, E., 1992. Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land Economics 68(3), 249–262.

Schlosberg, D., 2004. Reconceiving environmental justice: Global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics 13(3), 517–540.

Schroeder, H., 2010. Agency in international climate negotiations: The case of indigenous peoples and avoided deforestation. International Environmental Agreements 10, 317–332.

Scrieciu, S.S., 2007. Can economic causes of tropical deforestation be identified at a global level? Ecological Economics 62(3–4), 603–612.

Scriven, J.N.H., 2012. Preparing for REDD: Forest governance challenges in Peru’s Central Selva. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 31(4–5), 421–444.

Seymour, F.J., 2008. Forests, climate change, and human rights: Managing risks and trade-offs. In Humphreys, S. (ed.), Human Rights and Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 207–237.

Seymour, F.J. and Dubash, N.K., 2000. Right Conditions: The World Bank, Structural Adjustment, and Forest Policy Reform. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., USA.

Seymour, F.J. and Forwand, E., 2010. Governing sustainable forest management in the new climate regime. WIREs Climate Change 1, 803–810.

Shvidenko, A., Schepaschenko, D., McCallum, I. and Nilsson, S., 2011. Can the uncertainty of full carbon accounting of forest ecosystems be made acceptable to policymakers? Climate Change 103, 137–157.

Sierra, R. and Russman, E., 2006. On the efficiency of environmental service payments: A forest conservation assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. Ecological Economics 59(2), 131–141.

Siikamaki, J. and Newbold, S.C., 2012. Potential biodiversity benefits from international programs to reduce carbon emissions from deforestation. Ambio 41, 78–89.

Sikor, T., 2011. Financing Household Tree Plantations in Vietnam: Current Programmes and Future Options. Working Paper 69. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.

Simula, M., 2011. Analysis of REDD+ Financing Gaps and Overlaps. REDD+ Partnership, FAO, Rome, Italy.

Simula, M.A., 2015. Taking Stock of the Implementation of TFLET and REDDES Thematic Programmes. Final Report. ITTO, Yokohama, Japan.

Skutsch, M.M. and McCall, M.K., 2010. Reassessing REDD: Governance, markets and the hype cycle: An editorial comment. Climate Change 100, 395–402.

Skutsch, M., Bird, N., Trines, E., Dutschke, M., Frumhoff, P., Jong, B.H.J. de, Laake, P. van et al., 2007. Clearing the way for reducing emissions from tropical deforestation. Environmental Science and Policy 10, 322–334.

Skutsch, M.M., Simon, C., Velazquez, A. and Fernandez, J.C., 2013. Rights to carbon and payments for services rendered under REDD+: Options for the case of Mexico. Global Environmental Change 23, 813–825.

Skutsch, M.M., Vickers, B., Georgiadou, Y. and McCall, M.K., 2011. Alternative models for carbon payments to communities under REDD+: A comparison using the Polis model of actor inducements. Environmental Science and Policy 14, 140–151.

Skutsch, M.M., Zahabu, E. and Karky, B.S., 2009. Community Forest Management under REDD: Policy Conditions for Equitable Governance. Paper prepared for the 13th World Forestry Congress, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Sloan, S., 2015. The development-driven forest transition and its utility for REDD+. Ecological Economics 116, 1–11.

Smith, J. and Applegate, G., 2004. Could payments for forest carbon contribute to improved tropical forest management? Forest Policy and Economics 6, 153–167.

Smith, J. and Scherr, S.J., 2003. Capturing the value of forest carbon for local livelihoods. World Development 31(12), 2143–2160.

Smouts, M.C., 2008. The issue of an international forest regime. International Forest Policy Review 10(3), 429–432.

Sobrevila, C., 2008. The Role of Indigenous Peoples in Biodiversity Conservation: The Natural but Often Forgotten Partners. World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.

Sohngen, B. and Mendelsohn, R., 2003. An optimal control model of forest carbon sequestration. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(2), 448–457.

Sommerville, M., Milner-Gulland, E.J., Rahajaharison, M. and Jones, J.P., 2010. Impact of a community-based payment for environmental services intervention on forest use in Menabe, Madagascar. Conservation Biology 24(6), 1488–1498.

Sotirov, M. and Memmler, M., 2012. The Advocacy Coalition Framework in natural resource policy studies – Recent experiences and further prospects. Forest Policy and Economics 16, 51–64.

Spence, C., Kulovesi, K., Gutierrez, M. and Munoz, M., 2008. Great expectations: Understanding Bali and the climate change negotiations process. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 17(2), 142–153.

Srivastava, N., 2011. Changing dynamics of forest regulation: Coming full circle? Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 20(2), 113–122.

Steg, L., De Groot, J.I.M., Dreijerink, L., Abrahamse, W. and Siero, F., 2011. General antecedents of personal norms, policy acceptability, and intentions: The role of values, worldviews, and environmental concern. Society and Natural Resources 24(4), 349–367.

Stephan, B., 2012. Bringing discourse to the market: The commodification of avoided deforestation. Environmental Politics 21(4), 621–639.

Stephan, B. and Paterson, M., 2012. The politics of carbon markets: An introduction. Environmental Politics 21(4), 545–562.

Stephenson, S., 2011. Does ODA grow on trees? A legal analysis of REDD-ODA finance. European Journal of Legal Studies 4(1), 81–101.

Stern, N.H., 2006. The Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Stern, N.H., 2008. The economics of climate change. American Economic Review 98(2), 1–37.

Stevenson, H. and Dryzek, J.S., 2012. The discursive democratisation of global climate governance. Environmental Politics 21(2), 189–210.

Stewart-Harawira, M., 2005. The New Imperial Order: Indigenous Responses to Globalization. Huia Publishers, Wellington, New Zealand.

Streck, C., Gomez-Echeverri, L., Gutman, P., Loisel, C. and Werksman, J., 2009a. REDD+ Institutional Options Assessment: Developing an Efficient, Effective, and Equitable Institutional Framework for REDD+ under the UNFCCC. Meridian Institute, Washington, D.C., USA.

Streck, C., Tuerk, A. and Schlamadinger, B., 2009b. Forestry offsets in emissions trading systems: A link between systems? Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 14, 455–463.

Sun, B. and Sohngen, B., 2009. Set-asides for carbon sequestration: Implications for permanence and leakage. Climatic Change 96, 409–419.

Sunderlin, W.D., Hatcher, J. and Liddle, M., 2008. From Exclusion to Ownership? Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington, D.C., USA.

Sunderlin, W.D., Sills, E.O., Duchelle, A.E., Ekaputri, A.D., Kweka, D., Toniolo, M., Ball, S. et al., 2016. REDD+ at a critical juncture: Assessing the limits of polycentric governance for achieving climate change mitigation. International Forestry Review 17(4), 400–413.

Swickard, N. and Carnahan, K., 2010. Integrating project and national REDD+: The importance of the private sector. In Zhu, X., Møller, L.R., De Lopez, T. and Zaballa Romero, M. (eds.), Pathways for Implementing REDD+: Experiences from Carbon Markets and Communities. UNEP Risoe Centre, Roskilde, Denmark, 71–86.

Tacconi, L., Mahanty, S. and Suich, H., 2013. The livelihood impacts of payments for environmental services and implications for REDD+. Society and Natural Resources 26(6), 733–744.

Thompson, M.C., Baruah, M. and Carr, E.R., 2011. Seeing REDD+ as a project of environmental governance. Environmental Science and Policy 14(2), 100–110.

Tomaselli, I., 2006. Brief Study on Funding and Finance for Forestry and Forest-Based Sector. Final Report. United Nations Forum on Forests, UN, New York.

Underdal, A., 2011. Strategies in international regime negotiations: Reflecting background conditions or shaping outcomes? International Environmental Agreements 12, 129–144.

UNEP, 2002. Global Environmental Outlook 3. Earthscan, London, UK.

UNFCCC, 2016. Glossary of Climate Change Acronyms and Terms. Retrieved December 27, 2016 from http://unfccc.int/essential_background/glossary/items/3666.php.

Unruh, J.D., 2008. Carbon sequestration in Africa: The land tenure problem. Global Environmental Change 18, 700–707.

Vatn, A., 2010. An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 69, 1245–1252.

Vatn, A. and Vedeld, P., 2011. Getting Ready! A Study of National Governance Structures for REDD+. Noragric Report 59. Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.

Vatn, A. and Vedeld, P., 2013. National governance structures for REDD+. Global Environmental Change 23, 422–432.

Vatn, A., Barton, D.N., Lindhjem, H., Movik, S., Ring, I. and Santos, R., 2011. Can Markets Protect Biodiversity? An Evaluation of Different Financial Mechanisms. Noragric Report 60. Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.

Villamor, G.B. and Lasco, R.D., 2009. Rewarding upland people for forest conservation: Experience and lessons learned from case studies in the Philippines. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3–5), 304–321.

Wang, Z. and Lu, Y., 2010. Compensation for the conversion of sloping farmland to forest in China: A feasibility study of payment based on carbon sink. Journal of Environment and Development 19(1), 28–41.

WCFSD, 1999. Our Forests, Our Future. Summary Report. World Commission on Forests and Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Canada.

Wehkamp, J., Aquino, A., Fuss, S. and Reed, E.W., 2015. Analyzing the perception of deforestation drivers by African policy makers in light of possible REDD+ policy responses. Forest Policy and Economics 59, 7–18.

Weible, C.M., Heikkila, T., deLeon, P. and Sabatier, P.A., 2012. Understanding and influencing the policy process. Policy Sciences 45, 1–21.

Weible, C.M., Sabatier, P.A. and Flowers, J., 2008. A guide to the advocacy coalition framework. In Rabin, J. and Berman, E. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, 2nd edn., vol. 1(1). Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, UK, 1–10.

Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., 2007. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (REDD+): Insights from the UNFCCC COP-13 in Bali. Iddri – Idées pour le débat 12. Iddri, Paris, France.

Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. and Kongphan-Apirak, M., 2008. Emerging REDD+: A Preliminary Survey of Demonstration and Readiness Activities. Working Paper 46. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.

Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., Kongphan-Apirak, M. and Wunder, S., 2008. Reducing Forest Emissions in the Amazon Basin: A Review of Drivers of Land-Use Change and How Payments for Environmental Services Can Affect Them. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.

Wettestad, J., 2009. Interaction between EU carbon trading and the international climate regime: Synergies and learning. International Environmental Agreements 9, 393–408.

White, A. and Martin, A., 2002. Who Owns the World’s Forests? Forest Tenure and Public Forests in Transition. Forest Trends and Center for International Environmental Law, Washington, D.C., USA.

Winkel, G., 2012. Foucault in the forests: A review of the use of “Foucauldian” concepts in forest policy analysis. Forest Policy and Economics 16, 81–92.

World Bank, 2003. World Development Report 2003: Sustainable Development in a Dynamic World: Transforming Institutions, Growth, and Quality of Life. World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.

World Bank, 2004. Sustaining Forests: A Development Strategy. World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.

World Bank, 2009. Gender in Agriculture Sourcebook. World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.

Wunder, S., 2005. Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.

Wunder, S., 2006. Are direct payments for environmental services spelling doom for sustainable forest management in the tropics? Ecology and Society 11(2), art. 23.

Wunder, S., 2007. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conservation Biology 21(1), 48–58.

Wunder, S. and Albán, M., 2008. Decentralized payments for environmental services: The cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador. Ecological Economics 65(4), 685–698.

Wunder, S. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., 2009. Payments for ecosystem services: A new way of conserving biodiversity in forests. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3–5), 576–596.

Wunder, S., Bui Dung The and Ibarra, E., 2005. Payment Is Good, Control Is Better: Why Payments for Forest Environmental Services in Vietnam Have So Far Remained Incipient. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.

Wunder, S., Engel, S. and Pagiola, S., 2008. Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics 65(4), 834–852.

Yasmi, Y., Kelley, L., Murdiyarso, D. and Patel, T., 2012. The struggle over Asia’s forests: An overview of forest conflict and potential implications for REDD+. International Forestry Review 14(1), 99–109.

Young, O.R., 1991. Political leadership and regime formation: On the development of institutions in international society. International Organization 45(3), 281–308.

Zaballa Romero, M.E., Traerup, S., Wieben, E., Møller, J.R. and Koch, A., 2013. Economics of Forest and Forest Carbon Projects: Translating Lessons Learned into National REDD+ Implementation. UNEP Risoe, Nairobi, Kenya.

Zadek, S., 2011. Beyond climate finance: From accountability to productivity in addressing the climate challenge. Climate Policy 11, 1058–1068.

Zhu, X., Møller, L.R., De Lopez, T. and Zaballa Romero, M. (eds.), 2010. Pathways for Implementing REDD+: Experiences from Carbon Markets and Communities. Carbon Market Perspectives. UNEP Risoe Centre, Roskilde, Denmark.