A Handbook of Economic Anthropology
Show Less

A Handbook of Economic Anthropology

Edited by James G. Carrier

This unique Handbook contains substantial and invaluable summary discussions of work on economic processes and issues, and on the relationship between economic and non-economic areas of life. Furthermore it describes conceptual orientations that are important among economic anthropologists, and presents summaries of key issues in the anthropological study of economic life in different regions of the world. Its scope and accessibility make it useful both to those who are interested in a particular topic and to those who want to see the breadth and fruitfulness of an anthropological study of economics.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 33: South Asia

John Harriss


John Harriss I distinguish four themes in the economic anthropology of South Asia. The first concerns the ‘jajmani system’, a phrase that refers to the ways that economic transactions may be embedded in the social relationships of caste in Indian villages. This is the classic theme in the economic anthropology of South Asia, and it leads logically into a second, the commercialisation and commoditisation of the rural economy. Third is a consideration of recent research on the environment and the management of natural resources. Finally, I consider the economic implications of caste and religion more generally, a theme with a considerable historical pedigree. This theme is linked with the increasing interest within economics in culture, and in the relationships between ‘formal’ and ‘informal’ institutions. Rural economic transactions and the ‘jajmani system’ The ‘substantivist’ view of the economic anthropology of India was set out by Walter Neale, one of Karl Polanyi’s (see Isaac chap. 1 supra) students. Neale aimed to show ‘that the structure of the village economy … can be far better explained by the concepts of reciprocity and redistribution than they can by the more usual terms of economic theory’ (Neale 1957: 222). Central to his analysis was the notion of the redistribution of the ‘grain heap’ after the harvest through the allocation of shares to different village servants and officials (for example, the blacksmith, carpenter, washerman and barber), who were themselves all connected through relationships of reciprocity within the caste system. The ruler too had a share, which came...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.