Governance of Biodiversity Conservation in China and Taiwan
Show Less

Governance of Biodiversity Conservation in China and Taiwan

Gerald A. McBeath and Tse-Kang Leng

China and Taiwan have roughly one-eighth of the world’s known species. Their approaches to biodiversity issues thus have global as well as national repercussions. Gerald McBeath and Tse-Kang Leng explore the ongoing conflicts between economic development, typically pursued by businesses and governments, and communities seeking to preserve and protect local human and ecosystem values.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Conclusions

Gerald A. McBeath and Tse-Kang Leng


We conclude our study by summarizing the main points of the argument. We then take a different slant by asking whether there are ‘Chinese characteristics’ to the governance of biodiversity conservation. SUMMARY In this volume we have explored the problems and prospects of biodiversity loss and conservation in mainland China and Taiwan. The topic is an important one because China is a mega-diversity country, and China and Taiwan together are thought to possess 10–13 percent of the world’s known species. How both states approach problems of biodiversity loss thus has global as well as national repercussions. The perspective of governance underlies our approach to the topic. Not only have we treated political institutions and administrative agencies; we also have paid attention to the actions of individuals, groups (especially environmental non-governmental organizations (ENGOs)), and communities as they have sought to influence policy and are in turn influenced by it. The methodology we have used is explicitly comparative, and one of our objectives has been to understand the impacts, if any, of the sharply different political and economic systems of capitalist, democratic Taiwan and authoritarian China with its socialist market economy. China and Taiwan share the world’s oldest continuous civilization. Traditional China produced a rich skein of interpretations about human relationships with the environment, including anthropocentric, sentientist, and ecocentric views. Although Confucianism and Legalism were the orthodoxy, with the greatest impact on the behavior of leaders, Taoism, Buddhism, and a host of animistic beliefs taught reverence for nature and even endowed...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.