Organizing Transnational Accountability
Show Less

Organizing Transnational Accountability

Edited by Magnus Boström and Christina Garsten

This book adds a multi-disciplinary organizational perspective to the theoretical analysis of political accountability and argues for a broadening of the conventional understanding of the concepts of responsibility and accountability.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: The Political Logics of Accountability: From ‘Doing the Right Thing’ to ‘Doing the Thing Right’

Jessica Lindvert


Jessica Lindvert INTRODUCTION For many years public actors and social scientists in Western nations have been aware of the pressures on public administrations. To tackle this administrative overload or ‘growth to limits’ (as it was put by Flora, ed., 1987), innumerable reforms have been initiated, focusing on public sector efficiency and drawing upon the ideational goods of the New Public Management (NPM) school (Hood et al., 1999; Hughes, 2003; Rhodes, 1996). The dominance of this economic logic of governance has been challenged, however – more recently by new demands for transparency, accountability and stronger control mechanisms (see Power, 1997, for a general discussion of the audit society). The Swedish public sector is no exception to this general trend. ‘Good goals’ are measurable and controllable goals in which the ‘degree of fulfilment of objectives is not possible to manipulate’. Ranking, indicators and benchmarking are increasingly regarded as key policy instruments (Parliamentary Auditors, 2002, p. 68). Even within a domain such as the labour market – a policy field that has traditionally been assumed to require more flexible directives than the rest of the Swedish administration – this auditing rationality has now become the leading regulating principle.1 Support among Swedish public actors and economists for auditing arrangements is illustrated by a strong emphasis on planning and control, quantified objectives, follow-ups, simplified regulation, and fewer, measurable programmes (Ackum Agell, 1998, p. 38; Arbetsmarknadspolitik i förändring, 1998, p. 89; Government Bill [Gov. bill] 1999/2000: 98; National Board of Public Management, 2000;...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.