Interpreting and Implementing the TRIPS Agreement
Show Less

Interpreting and Implementing the TRIPS Agreement

Is it Fair?

Edited by Justin Malbon and Charles Lawson

This book considers whether the WTO agreement on ‘Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights’ (TRIPS) will become a vehicle for promoting greater international equity and engagement with the world economy or a tool for wealthy nations to extract excessive rents from poorer countries. Can TRIPS garner the necessary degree of legitimacy and public trust to deliver economic development? Can it become a key instrument for promoting international health and development? In response to these questions, the book proposes interpretive possibilities for the TRIPS’ text along with implementation strategies to avoid the threat of its irrelevancy due, amongst other things, to free trade agreements containing TRIPS-plus terms.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3: Knowledge Diplomacy and the New Intellectual Property Fundamentalism

Graham Dutfield


Graham Dutfield 1. INTRODUCTION In theory, the flexibilities of the World Trade Organization-administered TRIPS Agreement should provide developing countries with ample opportunities for creative interpretations of its provisions. Despite this, developing country freedom to exploit these opportunities is diminishing rapidly. Dispute settlement jurisprudence is one cause, but this is far less significant than that the United States, in particular, and the European Union, have developed successful strategies to hold developing countries to more rigid and higher standards of IP protection than TRIPS compliance requires. In some respects these standards of protection are even higher than those the United States has been willing to accept domestically. One of the most effective strategies being employed is that of so-called free trade agreements (FTAs) containing highly constraining and protectionist ‘TRIPS plus’ IP provisions that seem to be aimed to serve the interests of developed world corporations. The FTA negotiations and FTAs themselves seem to be neither wholly free, since the IP provisions in them are inherently protectionist, nor fair to the weaker negotiating parties. Unsurprisingly, business and pro-business interest groups have been very much behind the promotion of TRIPS plus measures. They are popular with the United States government and the European Commission not only because they work, but also because the United States and European economies, along with those of Japan and certain East Asian countries that tend also to favour TRIPS plus IP protection, are the major producers and exporters of patent, copyright and trade mark-protected goods and...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.