The Political Economy of Hurricane Katrina and Community Rebound
Show Less

The Political Economy of Hurricane Katrina and Community Rebound

Edited by Emily Chamlee-Wright and Virgil Henry Storr

In 2005 Hurricane Katrina posed an unprecedented set of challenges to formal and informal systems of disaster response and recovery. Informed by the Virginia School of Political Economy, the contributors to this study critically examine the public policy environment that led to both successes and failures in the post-Katrina disaster response and long-term recovery. Building from this perspective, this book lends critical insight into the nature of the social coordination problems disasters present, the potential for public policy to play a positive role, and the inherent limitations policymakers face in overcoming the myriad challenges that are a product of catastrophic disaster.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: Making Hurricane Response More Effective: Lessons from the Private Sector and the Coast Guard During Katrina

Steven Horwitz


1 Steven Horwitz INTRODUCTION 4.1 Many people believe that the government, particularly the federal government, should finance and direct both the response to and recovery from natural disasters. Such centralized political solutions have, after all, been the standard practice in recent US history. This belief often rests on the assumption that the private sector’s profit motive would thwart the charitable impulses generally regarded as essential for effective relief. However, the private sector’s involvement in the response to Hurricane Katrina along the Gulf Coast has provided strong reasons to be skeptical of this argument. The dramatic failures of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) during Hurricane Katrina have been well publicized and thoroughly dissected by the political process.2 Both critics and supporters of vigorous government responses to natural disasters have noted those failures and offered analyses of the reasons behind them (Burby 2006; Sobel and Leeson 2006). These discussions and analyses have led to some fairly minor changes in FEMA’s structure and operations for future crises.3 Despite FEMA’s massive failures, the debate to this point has been focused largely on improving the government’s response to future disasters and catastrophes. Policy makers and the public alike continue to assume that government must be responsible for nearly all disaster recovery activities. However, the reality of the response to Katrina demonstrates that the private sector is far more effective than the conventional wisdom suggests.4 Media accounts during the relief and recovery process and reports from local residents and private sector actors make it clear...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.