A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition
Show Less

A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition

Edited by Ruth Towse

The second edition of this widely acclaimed and extensively cited collection of original contributions by specialist authors reflects changes in the field of cultural economics over the last eight years. Thoroughly revised chapters alongside new topics and contributors bring the Handbook up to date, taking into account new research, literature and the impact of new technologies in the creative industries.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 20: Cultural Capital

David Throsby


David Throsby The concept of capital has been fundamental to the interpretation of production processes in economics for more than 200 years. Capital can be defined as durable goods that give rise to a flow of services over time that may be combined with other inputs such as labour to produce further goods and services. The original and longest-serving interpretation of capital arising from this definition has been physical or manufactured capital, meaning plant and equipment, machines, buildings and so on. In the second half of the twentieth century a further form of capital was identified, namely human capital, being the inherent characteristics of people that make them productive. Subsequently, the idea of natural capital was developed, allowing the designation of renewable and non-renewable resources as capital assets. More recently still, the concept of capital has been extended into the field of art and culture, in an effort to recognize the distinctive features of artworks and other cultural goods as capital assets, and to capture the ways in which such assets contribute, in combination with other inputs, to the production of further cultural goods and services. Thus the economic concept of cultural capital has taken shape. What is distinctive about cultural capital, allowing it to be set apart from the other forms of capital described above? Two possibilities have been suggested. First, it could be proposed that items of cultural capital are simply cultural goods that happen to be capital goods (in the sense defined in the previous paragraph) rather...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.