Handbook of Intuition Research
Show Less

Handbook of Intuition Research

Edited by Marta Sinclair

This groundbreaking interdisciplinary Handbook showcases the latest intuition research, providing an integrated framework that reconciles opposing views on what intuition is and how it works. The internationally renowned group of contributors explores different facets of the intuiting process and its outcome, the role of consciousness and affect in intuition, and alternate ways of capturing it. They tackle the function of intuition in expertise, strategy, entrepreneurship, and ethics and outline intuitive decision-making in the legal profession, medicine, film and wine industry, and teaching. The Handbook pushes the boundaries of our current understanding by exploring the possibility of non-local intuition based on the principles of quantum holography and investigating new techniques for developing intuitive skills.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 16: Intuition and the Noetic

Dean Radin


Dean Radin Intuition traditionally refers to a way of knowing through ‘immediate apprehension’, meaning to know without the usual constraints of space or time, and unmediated by the ordinary senses (Osbeck, 2001). This meaning is similar to the Greek words noēsis or noētikos, which refer to ways of knowing based on inner wisdom, direct understanding, or impressions that transcend rational analysis. The English version of noēsis is the word noetic, described by William James in The Varieties of Religious Experience as ‘states of insight into depths of truth unplumbed by the discursive intellect. They are illuminations, revelations, full of significance and importance, all inarticulate though they remain; and as a rule they carry with them a curious sense of authority’ (James, 1902: 371). Noetic experiences manifest as intuitions that appear in a flash, out of the blue, with correct answers to otherwise intractable scientific or technical problems, or with complete scores to intricate musical compositions, or with optimal solutions to complicated decisions. Because of the emphasis placed on rational knowing in Western scholarship, and especially because of the scientific tenet of physicalism – the belief that ‘mental entities, properties, relations and facts are all physical’ (Crane & Mellor, 1990: 185) – the traditional meanings of intuition and noetic ways of knowing came to be regarded as an inferior epistemology at best, and superstitious nonsense at worst. For about half of the twentieth century, the enthusiastic adoption of physicalism led many psychologists to embrace the peculiar Catch-22 whereby minds concluded with...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.