Theory and Practice of Harmonisation
Show Less

Theory and Practice of Harmonisation

Edited by Mads Andenas and Camilla Baasch Andersen

Harmonised and uniform international laws are now being spread across different jurisdictions and fields of law, bringing with them an increasing body of scholarship on practical problems and theoretical dimensions. This comprehensive and insightful book focuses on the contributions to the development and understanding of the critical theory of harmonisation.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Disharmony in the Process of Harmonisation? – The Analytical Account of the Strasbourg Court’s Variable Geometry of Decision-making Policy Based on the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine

Yutaka Arai-Takahashi


Yutaka Arai-Takahashi* 1. Introduction This chapter seeks to provide an analytical account of the margin of appreciation doctrine in the specific context of the harmonisation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR or Convention). It draws on the affinities between the arguments concerning the margin of appreciation and theories on judicial discretion while duly taking into account the structural difference between the roles and remits of international and national judges. Its aim is to provide a coherent theoretical explanation for the questions whether and if so, how, this doctrine can be said to facilitate the harmonisation of the standards of the ECHR in the enriched jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (the Strasbourg Court). The chapter firstly undertakes a thorough dissection of the intrinsic nature and underlying rationales of the margin of appreciation within the ECHR’s ‘constitutional’ framework. Secondly, it seeks to identify distinct methodologies leaning toward harmonisation, which can be distilled and culled from the Strasbourg Court’s reasoning processes. Thirdly, it analyses the role of the margin of appreciation as an antidote to a smooth process of harmonisation in the ECHR’s legal order in which the two opposing rationales of integration and diversification come to the fore in different forms. * Kent Law School, University of Kent, UK. 95 96 Theory and practice of harmonisation 2. The Margin of Appreciation as a ‘Policy Standard’ The concept of margin of appreciation, which has been developed in the jurisprudence of the ECHR, suggests discretion given to national authorities in...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.