Research Handbook on International Insurance Law and Regulation
Show Less

Research Handbook on International Insurance Law and Regulation

Edited by Julian Burling and Kevin Lazarus

Given its economic importance, insurance is a field that has been underserved as an area of academic study. This detailed book provides much needed coverage of insurance law and regulation in its international context.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 16: Enforcement: A Survey of Three Approaches to Insurance Regulatory Enforcement: The USA, the UK and Sweden

Aviva Abramovsky, Ian Mason, Robert Tischner and Stefan Bessman


Aviva Abramovsky, Ian Mason, Robert Tischner and Stefan Bessman 1. INTRODUCTION The concept of regulation of an industry cannot exist without an examination of how such regulatory systems are enforced. No industry is without its bad actors or inappropriate risk takers and a lack of enforcement action does not always reflect a healthy system. Faith in any regulatory system requires not only the existence of a proper regulatory scheme, but also the robust enforcement of those schemes and the regulated industry’s knowledge and acceptance that proper enforcement will occur. Enforcement is the consequence of improper behavior, but in insurance, as with other financial services industries, such enforcement takes two main forms. First, each national system has a series of enforcement mechanisms in place to supervise and review compliance with regulations prior to the risk necessarily causing any harm other than its deviation from the regulatory standards. Such standards exist, of course, for specific policy and prudential reasons and much regulatory effort is focused on ensuring compliance with the enacted regulations. Enforcement in this context may come in a number of different forms and may be informal discussions with insurers to request that they improve their compliance with certain rules. The second form of enforcement, the instigation of suit or legal proceeding (including disciplinary action by the regulator under its own rules, proceedings in the civil/criminal courts by regulators or private actions), is both more grave and, as a result of the difference in legal systems, more reflective...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.