This chapter considers the questions ‘are there different kinds of future and if so are there different ways of accessing those futures?’ Answers to these questions are considered from the perspective of the nature of time and the phenomenology of consciousness Time is redefined as multidimensional: (succession) plus (potential) plus ableness-to-be (action). The futures practitioner or decision maker is considered as a second-order anticipatory system described through an anticipatory cognition model. This anticipatory present moment (APM) - its structure and operation - is described in more detail as a way of explaining mental time travel. Futures studies is now seen as a second-order discipline (drawing on second-order cybernetics) where the perception of the observer is integral. Agency facing the unknown in multidimensional time increases the possible sources of information from the future. A more complete view of futures studies combines deterministic futures, open futures and transgressive futures represented by three horizons of paradigm change.
-
Bono, Edward de. (1992). Serious Creativity: Using the Power of Lateral Thinking to Create New Ideas. London: HarperCollins.
-
Bortoft, H. (1996). The Wholeness of Nature: Goethe’s Way of Science. Hudson, NY: Lindisfarne Press.
-
Curry, Andrew, and Anthony Hodgson. (2008). Seeing in multiple horizons. Journal of Futures Studies, 13(1): 1–20.
-
Gell, Alfred. (1992). The Anthropology of Time: Cultural Constructions of Temporal Maps and Images. Oxford: Berg.
-
Glasersfeld, Ernst von. (2001). The radical constructivist view of science. Foundations of Science, 6(1–3): 31–43.
-
Hodgson, Anthony. (2010). ‘Decision integrity and second order cybernetics’. In Cybernetics and Systems Theory in Management: Tools, Views and Advancements, edited by Stephen Wallis, 52–74. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
-
Hodgson, Anthony. (2013). Towards an ontology of the present moment. On the Horizon, 21(1): 24–38.
-
Hodgson, Anthony. (2016). Time, Pattern, perception: integrating systems and futures thinking. PhD Thesis. University of Hull.
-
Hodgson, Anthony. (2018). Second order anticipatory systems. In Handbook of Anticipation, edited by Roberto Poli, 1–18. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_97-1.
-
Hodgson, Anthony. (2019). Foresight and the seven dimensions of experience: a transdisciplinary transcultural approach. World Futures, 75(3): 113–34.
-
Hodgson, Anthony. (2020) Systems Thinking for a Turbulent World: A Search for New Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Hodgson, Anthony. (2021). The farthest we can see. In Knowledge for the Anthropocene – a Multidisciplinary Approach, edited by Francisco Javier Carillo. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
-
Hodgson, Anthony. (2023). Accessing the future through imagination. In Routledge Handbook for Creative Futures, edited by Alfonso Montuori and Gabrielle Donnelly, Ch. 15. Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Hoffman, Donald. (2019), The Case against Reality: How Evolution Hid the Truth from Our Eyes. London: Norton.
-
Holland, J.H., K.J. Holyoak, Richard E. Nisbett, and Paul R. Thagard. (1986). Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning and Discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
-
Ingvar, D.H. (1985). ‘Memory of the future’: an essay on the temporal organization of conscious awareness. Human Neurobiology, 4(3): 127–36. PMID: 3905726.
-
Klein, Stan. (2013). The temporal orientation of memory: it’s time for a change of direction. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2: 222–34.
-
Kuhn, Thomas. (1962). The Nature of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
-
Louie, A.H. (2013). The Reflection of Life: Functional Entailment and Immanence in Relational Biology. Dordrecht: Springer.
-
Midgley, G. (2011). Theoretical pluralism in systemic action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24(1): 1–15.
-
Miller, Riel. (2018). Transforming the Future. Abington: Routledge.
-
Muller, Karl H. (2016). Second-Order Science: The Revolution of Scientific Structures. Wien: Edition Echoraum.
-
Piaget, J. (1973). To Understand Is Tto Invent: The Future of Education. New York: Penguin Books.
-
Poli, Roberto. (2010). The many aspects of anticipation. Foresight, 12(3): 7–17.
-
Poli, Roberto. (2011) Steps toward an explicit ontology of the future. Journal of Future Studies, 16: 67–78.
-
Rosen, Robert. (1991) Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into the Nature, Origin and Fabrication of Life. New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Scott, Bernard. (2004). 2nd order cybernetics: an historical introduction. Kybernetes, 33(9/10): 1365–78.
-
Seligman, Martin E.P., Peter Railton, Roy. F. Baumeister, and Chandra Sripada. (2016). Homo Prospectus. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Sharpe, Bill. (2013). Three Horizons: The Patterning of Hope. Axminster: Triarchy Press.
-
Sharpe, B., and A. Hodgson. (2017). Anticipation in three horizons. In Springer Handbook of Anticipation. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_82-1.
-
Suddendorf, T., D.R. Addis, and M.C. Corballis. (2009). Mental time travel and the shaping of the human mind. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364: 1317–24.
-
Targ, Russell, and Jane Karra. (1989). Miracles of Mind Exploring Nonlocal Consciousness and Spiritual Healing. Novata CA: New World Library.
-
Toffler, Alvin. (1970). Future Shock. New York: Random House.
-
Van der Heijden, Kees. (2009). Scenarios planning. In Making Essential Choices with Scant Information, edited by Terry M. Williams, Knut Samset, and Kjell J. Sunnevag, 68–84. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Wack, Pierre. (1985). Scenarios: the gentle art of re-perceiving. Harvard Business Review.
-
Weber, Klaus, and Mary Ann Glynn. (2006). Making sense with intuitions: context thought and action in Karl Weik’s Theory. Organization Studies, 27(11): 163901660.
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your Elgar Online account
