Chapter 9: Liberating the human imagination: futures literacy and the diversification of anticipation
Restricted access

What does it mean to ‘liberate the human imagination’? First, it does not mean, from the point of view of this chapter, somehow inventing wilder or wackier or unique descriptions of the future. Nor is it about more credible forecasts or visions that are so believable they launch a thousand ships. Here, freedom of the imagination emerges from the capacity to understand the different reasons and methods people use to describe situations that are not in the past or the present. The human imagination, like freedom more generally, needs to be exercised to reach its potential. Aptitude is not enough. Potential needs to be realized by taking the opportunity. And such expression can only occur by cultivating, through experience and theory, a deeper understanding of the subject: in this case the attributes and functioning of human anticipatory systems and processes (ASP). To be futures literate, to enable our imagination to wander with confidence, creativity, and openness is to embrace both knowing and not-knowing. In practical terms, from an ASP perspective, this means being able to grasp two fundamental enabling distinctions, the difference between: (a) ‘anticipation-for-the-future’ and ‘anticipation-for-emergence’; and (b) perception and choice. Today’s dominant conventions and habits reduce these four categories into two and as a result inhibit and diminish the ability to sense and make-sense of difference in the present.

  • Adam, B., & Groves, C. (2007). Future Matters: Action, Knowledge, Ethics. Brill.

  • Akomolafe, B. (2020). The times are urgent: Let us slow down. URL: https://www.bayoakomolafe.net/post/the-times-are-urgent-lets-slow-down.

  • Archambault, A., & Venet, M. (2007). Le développement de l’imagination selon Piaget et Vygotsky: d’un acte spontané à une activité consciente. Sustainable Energy, 33(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.7202/016186ar.

  • Asma, S.T. (2022). Imagination: A new foundation for the science of mind. Biological Theory, 17(4), 243–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-022-00410-4.

  • Dator, J. (2022). Beyond Identities: Human Becomings in Weirding Worlds. Springer.

  • De Landa, M. (2006). A New Philosophy of Society. Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. Continuum International Publishing Group. Annotated edn, 14 September.

  • De Landa, M. (2016). Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh University Press.

  • Dillon, S., & Craig, C. (2022). Storylistening: How narrative evidence can improve public reasoning about climate change. WIREs Climate Change, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.812.

  • Heinlein, R.A. (1987). Stranger in a Strange Land (10th Printing, p. 438). Ace.

  • Humphrey, N. (2022). Sentience: The Invention of Consciousness. Oxford University Press.

  • Kafka, F. (2002). Metamorphosis. D. Wyllie, trans. Project Gutenberg eBook (1915).

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

  • Langer, S.K. (1967). Mind: An Essay on Human Feeling: I. Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Latour, B. (2004). How to talk about the body? The Normative dimension of science studies. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 205–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042943.

  • Lipsey, R.G., Sparks, G.R., & Steiner, P.O. (1973). Economics. Harper and Row.

  • Louie, A.H. (2010). Robert Rosen’s anticipatory systems. Foresight (Los Angeles, Calif.), 12(3), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636681011049848.

  • Miller, R. (2018). Sensing and making-sense of Futures Literacy: Towards a Futures Literacy Framework. In R. Miller (ed.), Transforming the Future: Anticipation in the 21st Century (1st edn, pp. 15–36). Routledge.

  • Miller, R., & Poli, R. (2010). Anticipatory systems and the philosophical foundations of futures studies. Foresight (Los Angeles, Calif.), 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/fs.2010.27312caa.001.

  • Miller, R. et al. (2018). The discipline of anticipation. In R. Miller (ed.), Transforming the Future, Anticipation in the 21st Century (1st edn, pp. 37–50). Routledge.

  • Nadin, M. (2004). Anticipation. The End Is Where We Start from. Lars Mueller Publishers.

  • Nadin, M. (2010). Anticipation. International Journal of General Systems, 39(1), 35–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081070903453735.

  • Poli, R. (2010). The many aspects of anticipation. Foresight, 12(3), 7–17.

  • Poli, R. (2010). An introduction to the ontology of anticipation. Futures, 42(7), 769–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.04.028.

  • Poli, R. (2014). Anticipation: A New Thread for the Human and Social Sciences? Cadmus.

  • Poli, R. (ed.). (2019). Handbook of Anticipation: Theoretical and Applied Aspects of the Use of Future in Decision Making (1st edn). Springer.

  • Rosen, R. (2012). Anticipatory Systems: Philosophical, Mathematical, and Methodological Foundations (International Federation for Systems Research International Series on Systems Science and Engineering, Vol. 1) (2nd edn, p. 532). Springer.

  • Samuelson, P.A. (1948). Economics: An Introductory Analysis. McGraw-Hill.

  • Sternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T.I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R.J. Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge University Press.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with your Elgar account
Handbook